• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国全国代表性样本中当前吸烟的共同风险因素。

Co-occurring risk factors for current cigarette smoking in a U.S. nationally representative sample.

作者信息

Higgins Stephen T, Kurti Allison N, Redner Ryan, White Thomas J, Keith Diana R, Gaalema Diann E, Sprague Brian L, Stanton Cassandra A, Roberts Megan E, Doogan Nathan J, Priest Jeff S

机构信息

Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, United States.

Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory Science, University of Vermont, United States.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2016 Nov;92:110-117. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.025. Epub 2016 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.025
PMID:26902875
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4992654/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Relatively little has been reported characterizing cumulative risk associated with co-occurring risk factors for cigarette smoking. The purpose of the present study was to address that knowledge gap in a U.S. nationally representative sample.

METHODS

Data were obtained from 114,426 adults (≥18years) in the U.S. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (years 2011-13). Multiple logistic regression and classification and regression tree (CART) modeling were used to examine risk of current smoking associated with eight co-occurring risk factors (age, gender, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, poverty, drug abuse/dependence, alcohol abuse/dependence, mental illness).

RESULTS

Each of these eight risk factors was independently associated with significant increases in the odds of smoking when concurrently present in a multiple logistic regression model. Effects of risk-factor combinations were typically summative. Exceptions to that pattern were in the direction of less-than-summative effects when one of the combined risk factors was associated with generally high or low rates of smoking (e.g., drug abuse/dependence, age ≥65). CART modeling identified subpopulation risk profiles wherein smoking prevalence varied from a low of 11% to a high of 74% depending on particular risk factor combinations. Being a college graduate was the strongest independent predictor of smoking status, classifying 30% of the adult population.

CONCLUSIONS

These results offer strong evidence that the effects associated with common risk factors for cigarette smoking are independent, cumulative, and generally summative. The results also offer potentially useful insights into national population risk profiles around which U.S. tobacco policies can be developed or refined.

摘要

引言

关于与吸烟并存的风险因素相关的累积风险,所报告的内容相对较少。本研究的目的是在美国具有全国代表性的样本中填补这一知识空白。

方法

数据取自美国全国药物使用和健康调查(2011 - 13年)中的114,426名成年人(≥18岁)。使用多元逻辑回归以及分类与回归树(CART)建模来检验与八个并存风险因素(年龄、性别、种族/族裔、教育程度、贫困、药物滥用/依赖、酒精滥用/依赖、精神疾病)相关的当前吸烟风险。

结果

在多元逻辑回归模型中,当这八个风险因素同时存在时,每一个都与吸烟几率的显著增加独立相关。风险因素组合的影响通常是累加的。当其中一个组合风险因素与普遍较高或较低的吸烟率相关时(例如,药物滥用/依赖、年龄≥65岁),这种模式会出现小于累加效应的例外情况。CART建模确定了亚人群风险概况,其中吸烟患病率根据特定的风险因素组合从低至11%到高至74%不等。大学毕业是吸烟状况最强的独立预测因素,可对30%的成年人口进行分类。

结论

这些结果提供了有力证据,表明与吸烟常见风险因素相关的影响是独立的、累积的且通常是累加的。这些结果还为美国烟草政策可以据此制定或完善的全国人口风险概况提供了潜在有用的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef8c/4992654/ff123b717f5c/nihms782601f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef8c/4992654/5731762c8ca3/nihms782601f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef8c/4992654/78f4bccc30d9/nihms782601f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef8c/4992654/ff123b717f5c/nihms782601f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef8c/4992654/5731762c8ca3/nihms782601f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef8c/4992654/78f4bccc30d9/nihms782601f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef8c/4992654/ff123b717f5c/nihms782601f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Co-occurring risk factors for current cigarette smoking in a U.S. nationally representative sample.美国全国代表性样本中当前吸烟的共同风险因素。
Prev Med. 2016 Nov;92:110-117. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.025. Epub 2016 Feb 21.
2
Characterizing the intersection of Co-occurring risk factors for illicit drug abuse and dependence in a U.S. nationally representative sample.在美国具有全国代表性的样本中,对非法药物滥用和依赖的并发风险因素的交集进行特征描述。
Prev Med. 2016 Nov;92:118-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.030. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
3
Current cigarette smoking among U.S. college graduates.美国大学毕业生的当前吸烟状况。
Prev Med. 2019 Nov;128:105853. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105853. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
4
Understanding individual differences in vulnerability to cigarette smoking is enhanced by attention to the intersection of common risk factors.关注常见风险因素的交集,有助于增强对吸烟易感性个体差异的理解。
Prev Med. 2018 Dec;117:38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
5
Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Other Risk Factors for Using Higher-Nicotine/Tar-Yield (Regular Full-Flavor) Cigarettes.社会经济劣势和使用高尼古丁/焦油(常规全味)卷烟的其他风险因素。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Nov 7;19(12):1425-1433. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw201.
6
E-cigarette awareness, perceived harmfulness, and ever use among U.S. adults.美国成年人对电子烟的认知、感知危害和使用情况。
Prev Med. 2017 Nov;104:92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.07.014. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
7
Co-occurring obesity and smoking among U.S. women of reproductive age: Associations with educational attainment and health biomarkers and outcomes.美国育龄女性中肥胖与吸烟并存的情况:与教育程度、健康生物标志物及结果的关联。
Prev Med. 2015 Nov;80:60-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.05.020. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
8
Vital signs: current cigarette smoking among adults aged >or=18 years --- United States, 2009.生命体征:2009 年美国 18 岁及以上成年人当前吸烟状况。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 Sep 10;59(35):1135-40.
9
Vital signs: current cigarette smoking among adults aged ≥18 years with mental illness - United States, 2009-2011.生命体征:2009-2011 年美国≥18 岁有精神疾病的成年人中当前吸烟状况。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013 Feb 8;62(5):81-7.
10
Recent Findings on the Prevalence of E-Cigarette Use Among Adults in the U.S.美国成年人电子烟使用流行率的最新发现
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Mar;52(3):385-390. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.029. Epub 2016 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurocognitive impairment and its associated factors among patients with diabetes mellitus who have follow up at referral hospital in Northwest, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西北部转诊医院接受随访的糖尿病患者的神经认知障碍及其相关因素。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Nov 26;15:1459585. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1459585. eCollection 2024.
2
Cumulative psychosocial and health disparities in US adolescent cigarette smoking, 2002-2019.2002 - 2019年美国青少年吸烟的累积心理社会和健康差异
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025 Apr 1;117(4):665-672. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae286.
3
Geographical location, cigarette risk perceptions, and current smoking among older US adults.

本文引用的文献

1
A review of the literature on contingency management in the treatment of substance use disorders, 2009-2014.2009 - 2014年关于物质使用障碍治疗中应急管理的文献综述。
Prev Med. 2016 Nov;92:36-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
2
A behavioral economic perspective on smoking persistence in serious mental illness.关于严重精神疾病患者吸烟持续行为的行为经济学视角
Prev Med. 2016 Nov;92:31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 May 16.
3
Changes in Cigarette Smoking Behavior Among US Young Workers From 2005 to 2010: The Role of Occupation.
美国老年人的地理位置、对香烟风险的认知与当前吸烟情况
Tob Induc Dis. 2024 Sep 12;22. doi: 10.18332/tid/191827. eCollection 2024.
4
Prevalence of Cigarette Smoking, E-cigarette Use, and Dual Use Among Urban and Rural Women During the Peripartum Period, PRAMS 2015-2020.2015 - 2020年围产期风险评估监测系统(PRAMS)中城乡女性吸烟、使用电子烟及双重使用情况的患病率
Public Health Rep. 2024 Nov-Dec;139(6):708-716. doi: 10.1177/00333549241251982. Epub 2024 May 23.
5
Risk profiles for smoke behavior in COVID-19: a classification and regression tree analysis approach.COVID-19 中烟雾行为的风险特征:分类回归树分析方法。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 21;23(1):2302. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17224-z.
6
Cumulative vulnerabilities and smoking abstinence: A test from a randomized clinical trial.累积脆弱性与戒烟:一项随机临床试验的检验。
Behav Res Ther. 2023 Mar;162:104272. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2023.104272. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
7
Relapse to problem drinking or trading up to spirits? Using U.S. national cross-sectional survey data to highlight possible negative impacts of potential tobacco retail changes.复饮或转向烈酒?利用美国全国横断面调查数据强调潜在烟草零售变化可能带来的负面影响。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2022 Nov 1;17(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13011-022-00498-8.
8
Relating individual differences in the reinforcing value of smoking and dependence severity to nicotine exposure levels in vulnerable populations.将吸烟的强化价值和依赖严重程度的个体差异与易感染人群中的尼古丁暴露水平联系起来。
Prev Med. 2022 Dec;165(Pt B):107312. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107312. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
9
Intersections between environmental reward availability, loss aversion, and delay discounting as potential risk factors for cigarette smoking and other substance use.环境奖励可得性、损失厌恶和延迟折扣之间的交集,作为吸烟和其他物质使用的潜在风险因素。
Prev Med. 2022 Dec;165(Pt B):107270. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107270. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
10
Disparities in Tobacco Use by Disability and Type: Findings From the 2019 National Health Interview Survey.残疾和类型导致的烟草使用差异:来自 2019 年全国健康访谈调查的结果。
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Oct;63(4):552-563. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.05.004. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
2005年至2010年美国年轻劳动者吸烟行为的变化:职业的作用。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Jun;18(6):1414-23. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv240. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
4
Do Socioeconomic Risk Factors for Cigarette Smoking Extend to Smokeless Tobacco Use?吸烟的社会经济风险因素是否也适用于无烟烟草的使用?
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 May;18(5):869-73. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv199. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
5
A literature review on prevalence of gender differences and intersections with other vulnerabilities to tobacco use in the United States, 2004-2014.2004 - 2014年美国烟草使用中性别差异及与其他脆弱性交叉情况的患病率文献综述。
Prev Med. 2015 Nov;80:89-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
6
Smoking and cardiac rehabilitation participation: Associations with referral, attendance and adherence.吸烟与心脏康复参与情况:与转诊、出勤及依从性的关联
Prev Med. 2015 Nov;80:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.009. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
7
An application in identifying high-risk populations in alternative tobacco product use utilizing logistic regression and CART: a heuristic comparison.一项利用逻辑回归和分类与回归树识别新型烟草制品使用中高危人群的应用:启发式比较
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 9;15:341. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1582-z.
8
Protecting children from smoke exposure in disadvantaged homes.保护贫困家庭中的儿童免受烟雾侵害。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Apr;17(4):496-501. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu217.
9
Behavior change, health, and health disparities: an introduction.行为改变、健康与健康差异:引言
Prev Med. 2014 Nov;68:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.10.007.
10
Examining vulnerability to smokeless tobacco use among adolescents and adults meeting diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder.在符合重度抑郁症诊断标准的青少年和成年人中,研究无烟烟草使用的易感性。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Aug;22(4):316-22. doi: 10.1037/a0037291. Epub 2014 Jun 30.