Suppr超能文献

伐尼克兰与心血管不良事件:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析

Varenicline and Adverse Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Sterling Lee H, Windle Sarah B, Filion Kristian B, Touma Lahoud, Eisenberg Mark J

机构信息

Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital/McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital/McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Feb 22;5(2):e002849. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002849.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Varenicline is an efficacious smoking-cessation drug. However, previous meta-analyses provide conflicting results regarding its cardiovascular safety. The publication of several new randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provides an opportunity to reassess this potential adverse drug reaction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for RCTs that compare varenicline with placebo for smoking cessation. RCTs reporting cardiovascular serious adverse events and/or all-cause mortality during the treatment period or within 30 days of treatment discontinuation were eligible for inclusion. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs were generated by using DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models. Thirty-eight RCTs met our inclusion criteria (N=12 706). Events were rare in both varenicline (57/7213) and placebo (43/5493) arms. No difference was observed for cardiovascular serious adverse events when comparing varenicline with placebo (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.72-1.49). Similar findings were obtained when examining cardiovascular (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.57-1.89) and noncardiovascular patients (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.64-1.64). Deaths were rare in both varenicline (11/7213) and placebo (9/5493) arms. Although 95% CIs were wide, pooling of all-cause mortality found no difference between groups (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.50-1.52), including when stratified by participants with (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.40-3.83) and without (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.40-1.48) cardiovascular disease.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence that varenicline increases the rate of cardiovascular serious adverse events. Results were similar among those with and without cardiovascular disease. Given varenicline's efficacy as a smoking cessation drug and the long-term cardiovascular benefits of cessation, it should continue to be prescribed for smoking cessation.

摘要

背景

伐尼克兰是一种有效的戒烟药物。然而,先前的荟萃分析关于其心血管安全性给出了相互矛盾的结果。几项新的随机对照试验(RCT)的发表为重新评估这种潜在的药物不良反应提供了契机。

方法与结果

我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆,以查找将伐尼克兰与安慰剂用于戒烟进行比较的随机对照试验。报告治疗期间或停药后30天内心血管严重不良事件和/或全因死亡率的随机对照试验符合纳入标准。使用DerSimonian-Laird随机效应模型生成具有95%置信区间(CI)的相对风险(RR)。38项随机对照试验符合我们的纳入标准(N = 12706)。伐尼克兰组(57/7213)和安慰剂组(43/5493)的事件均很少见。将伐尼克兰与安慰剂进行比较时,未观察到心血管严重不良事件有差异(RR 1.03,95% CI 0.72 - 1.49)。在检查心血管疾病患者(RR 1.04,95% CI 0.57 - 1.89)和非心血管疾病患者(RR 1.03,95% CI 0.64 - 1.64)时也得到了类似的结果。伐尼克兰组(11/7213)和安慰剂组(9/5493)的死亡情况均很少见。尽管95%置信区间较宽,但全因死亡率的汇总分析发现两组之间无差异(RR 0.88,95% CI 0.50 - 1.52),包括按有无心血管疾病分层时(有心血管疾病者RR 1.24,95% CI 0.40 - 3.83;无心血管疾病者RR 0.77,95% CI 0.40 - 1.48)。

结论

我们没有发现证据表明伐尼克兰会增加心血管严重不良事件的发生率。在有和没有心血管疾病的人群中结果相似。鉴于伐尼克兰作为戒烟药物的疗效以及戒烟对心血管的长期益处,它应继续用于戒烟治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57fd/4802486/718722544cb9/JAH3-5-e002849-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验