Scheiderer Emily M, Wang Ting, Tomko Rachel L, Wood Phillip K, Trull Timothy J
Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri - Columbia.
Clin Psychol Sci. 2016 Jan 1;4(1):67-81. doi: 10.1177/2167702615573214. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
Ecological momentary assessment (EMA; Stone & Shiffman, 1994) was utilized to examine affective instability (AI) in the daily lives of outpatients with borderline personality disorder (BPD; =78) with and without posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A psychiatric control group (=50) composed of outpatients with major depressive disorder/dysthymia (MDD/DYS) was employed to compare across subgroups: BPD-only, BPD+PTSD, MDD/DYS-only, and MDD/DYS+PTSD. Compared to the BPD-only group, the BPD+PTSD group had significantly greater instability of fear and sadness, but did not significantly differ in instability of hostility or aggregate negative affect. This pattern of elevated instability of fear and sadness was not present-and, in fact, was reversed-in the MDD/DYS group. Results emphasize the importance of examining AI within the context of specific comorbidities and affect types. Treatment and research addressing AI in the context of BPD-PTSD comorbidity may benefit from a focus on fear and sadness as separate from hostility or general negative affect.
采用生态瞬时评估法(EMA;斯通和希夫曼,1994年),对患有和未患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的边缘型人格障碍(BPD;n = 78)门诊患者日常生活中的情感不稳定(AI)情况进行了检查。选取了一个由患有重度抑郁症/心境恶劣障碍(MDD/DYS)的门诊患者组成的精神科对照组(n = 50),用于跨亚组比较:单纯BPD组、BPD+PTSD组、单纯MDD/DYS组和MDD/DYS+PTSD组。与单纯BPD组相比,BPD+PTSD组的恐惧和悲伤情绪不稳定程度显著更高,但在敌意情绪不稳定或总体负面情绪方面无显著差异。这种恐惧和悲伤情绪不稳定程度升高的模式在MDD/DYS组中并不存在——事实上,情况正好相反。研究结果强调了在特定共病情况和情感类型背景下检查AI的重要性。在BPD-PTSD共病背景下针对AI进行的治疗和研究若将重点放在与敌意或一般负面情绪相区分的恐惧和悲伤情绪上,可能会有所助益。