Suppr超能文献

边缘型人格障碍与创伤后应激障碍共病个体的消极情绪不稳定性

Negative Affect Instability among Individuals with Comorbid Borderline Personality Disorder and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

作者信息

Scheiderer Emily M, Wang Ting, Tomko Rachel L, Wood Phillip K, Trull Timothy J

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri - Columbia.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Sci. 2016 Jan 1;4(1):67-81. doi: 10.1177/2167702615573214. Epub 2015 Apr 21.

Abstract

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA; Stone & Shiffman, 1994) was utilized to examine affective instability (AI) in the daily lives of outpatients with borderline personality disorder (BPD; =78) with and without posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A psychiatric control group (=50) composed of outpatients with major depressive disorder/dysthymia (MDD/DYS) was employed to compare across subgroups: BPD-only, BPD+PTSD, MDD/DYS-only, and MDD/DYS+PTSD. Compared to the BPD-only group, the BPD+PTSD group had significantly greater instability of fear and sadness, but did not significantly differ in instability of hostility or aggregate negative affect. This pattern of elevated instability of fear and sadness was not present-and, in fact, was reversed-in the MDD/DYS group. Results emphasize the importance of examining AI within the context of specific comorbidities and affect types. Treatment and research addressing AI in the context of BPD-PTSD comorbidity may benefit from a focus on fear and sadness as separate from hostility or general negative affect.

摘要

采用生态瞬时评估法(EMA;斯通和希夫曼,1994年),对患有和未患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的边缘型人格障碍(BPD;n = 78)门诊患者日常生活中的情感不稳定(AI)情况进行了检查。选取了一个由患有重度抑郁症/心境恶劣障碍(MDD/DYS)的门诊患者组成的精神科对照组(n = 50),用于跨亚组比较:单纯BPD组、BPD+PTSD组、单纯MDD/DYS组和MDD/DYS+PTSD组。与单纯BPD组相比,BPD+PTSD组的恐惧和悲伤情绪不稳定程度显著更高,但在敌意情绪不稳定或总体负面情绪方面无显著差异。这种恐惧和悲伤情绪不稳定程度升高的模式在MDD/DYS组中并不存在——事实上,情况正好相反。研究结果强调了在特定共病情况和情感类型背景下检查AI的重要性。在BPD-PTSD共病背景下针对AI进行的治疗和研究若将重点放在与敌意或一般负面情绪相区分的恐惧和悲伤情绪上,可能会有所助益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a9/4759237/58d9e68dea65/nihms659283f1.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Ambulatory assessment.门诊评估。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9:151-76. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185510. Epub 2012 Nov 13.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验