Kelly H W, Murphy S
College of Pharmacy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque 87131.
DICP. 1989 Dec;23(12):995-8. doi: 10.1177/106002808902301209.
Recent reviews and editorials have indicated that theophylline may not be effective for the therapy of acute severe asthma. This judgment is primarily based on data comparing the efficacy of theophylline to inhaled beta 2-agonists in the emergency room treatment of asthma. The authors believe that it is inappropriate to extrapolate data from short-term studies in the emergency room setting to the hospitalized patients with status asthmaticus. Studies of hospitalized patients in which the patients were monitored for at least 24 hours all demonstrate a positive therapeutic effect for theophylline. The possible reasons for the discrepancies between hospitalized patients and emergency room patients are discussed. Theophylline is still recommended for the management of the hospitalized patient with status asthmaticus.
近期的综述和社论表明,茶碱可能对急性重症哮喘的治疗无效。这一判断主要基于在哮喘急诊治疗中比较茶碱与吸入性β2受体激动剂疗效的数据。作者认为,将急诊室短期研究的数据外推至住院的哮喘持续状态患者是不合适的。对住院患者进行至少24小时监测的研究均表明茶碱具有积极的治疗效果。文中讨论了住院患者与急诊室患者之间存在差异的可能原因。对于住院的哮喘持续状态患者,仍推荐使用茶碱进行治疗。