Gordon Brett A, Bird Stephen R, MacIsaac Richard J, Benson Amanda C
Discipline of Exercise Physiology, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Australia; Physiotherapy Department, Austin Hospital, Austin Health, Australia; Discipline of Exercise Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, RMIT University, Australia.
Discipline of Exercise Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, RMIT University, Australia.
J Sci Med Sport. 2016 Oct;19(10):795-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
Regular exercise is advocated for individuals with type 2 diabetes, without fully understanding the acute (0-72h post-exercise) glycaemic response. This study assessed post-exercise glycaemic profiles of non-exercising individuals with insulin treated type 2 diabetes, following resistance and aerobic exercise.
Randomised cross-over trial.
Fourteen individuals with insulin treated type 2 diabetes (9 males, 5 females) aged 58.1±7.1 years (HbA1c: 8.0±0.6%) were allocated to single sessions of resistance (six whole-body exercises, three sets, 8-10 repetitions, 70% 1RM) and aerobic (30min cycling, 60% VO2peak) exercise, 7-days apart, with the day prior to the first exercise day of each intervention being the control condition. Immediately prior to exercise, insulin dosage was halved and breakfast consumed. Continuous glucose monitoring was undertaken to determine area under the curve and glucose excursions.
Blood glucose initially increased (0-2h) following both resistance and aerobic exercise (p<0.001), peaking at 12.3±3.4mmolL(-1) and 12.3±3.3mmolL(-1), respectively. Area under the glucose curve was not statistically different over any of the 24h periods (p=0.12), or different in response to resistance (222±41mmolL(-1)24h(-1)) or aerobic (211±40 mmolL(-1)24h(-1)) exercise (p=0.56). Incidence of hyperglycaemia did not differ between exercise modes (p=0.68). Hypoglycaemic events were identified in three and four participants following resistance and aerobic exercise respectively: these did not require treatment.
Glycaemic response is not different between exercise modes, although 50% insulin dose reduction prior to exercise impairs the expected improvement. A common clinical recommendation of 50% insulin dose reduction does not appear to cause adverse glycaemic events.
提倡2型糖尿病患者进行规律运动,但对急性(运动后0 - 72小时)血糖反应尚未完全了解。本研究评估了接受胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病非运动个体在进行抗阻运动和有氧运动后的运动后血糖谱。
随机交叉试验。
14名接受胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者(9名男性,5名女性),年龄58.1±7.1岁(糖化血红蛋白:8.0±0.6%),被分配进行单次抗阻运动(六项全身运动,三组,每组8 - 10次重复,70% 1RM)和有氧运动(30分钟骑行,60% VO₂峰值),两次运动间隔7天,每次干预的第一次运动日前一天为对照条件。运动前立即将胰岛素剂量减半并进食早餐。采用连续血糖监测来确定曲线下面积和血糖波动情况。
抗阻运动和有氧运动后血糖最初均升高(0 - 2小时)(p<0.001),分别在12.3±3.4mmol/L和12.3±3.3mmol/L时达到峰值。葡萄糖曲线下面积在任何24小时时间段内均无统计学差异(p = 0.12),对抗阻运动(222±41mmol/L·24h⁻¹)或有氧运动(211±40mmol/L·24h⁻¹)的反应也无差异(p = 0.56)。高血糖发生率在运动模式之间无差异(p = 0.68)。分别有3名和4名参与者在抗阻运动和有氧运动后发生低血糖事件:这些事件无需治疗。
尽管运动前将胰岛素剂量减少50%会削弱预期的改善效果,但运动模式之间的血糖反应并无差异。将胰岛素剂量减少50%这一常见的临床建议似乎不会导致不良血糖事件。