• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新诊断系统性红斑狼疮患者的纵向治疗模式及相关结局

Longitudinal Treatment Patterns and Associated Outcomes in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

作者信息

Kan Hong, Nagar Saurabh, Patel Jeetvan, Wallace Daniel J, Molta Charles, Chang David J

机构信息

GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2016 Mar;38(3):610-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.01.016. Epub 2016 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.01.016
PMID:26907503
Abstract

PURPOSE

The treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is complex, with a wide range of drugs commonly prescribed. The aims of this study were to identify longitudinal treatment patterns in patients with incident SLE and to estimate the associations of treatment patterns with clinical and economic outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational cohort study used a US managed care claims database to identify patients with newly diagnosed SLE and 4-year treatment follow-up. Patients were aged ≥ 18 years, with continuous medical and pharmacy benefits for 12 months before and 48 months after the index date (first medical claim with a diagnosis of SLE). Longitudinal treatment patterns were grouped using a k-means cluster analysis. Therapies were included in the cluster analysis if the mean number of prescriptions in each year was ≥ 0.05. Clinical and economic outcomes were compared across clusters using multivariate regression analyses.

FINDINGS

Data from 1611 patients with incident SLE were analyzed (91.4% women; mean [SD] age, 44.5 [9.5] years; 56.2% managed primarily by a specialist). Hydroxychloroquine and corticosteroids were the most commonly prescribed therapies; methotrexate, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil also met the criteria for inclusion in the cluster analysis. Ten treatment clusters were identified; the most common was minimally treated patients (42.8%). Hydroxychloroquine monotherapy, corticosteroid monotherapy, and corticosteroid/hydroxychloroquine combination therapy were received by 34.0%, 11.2%, and 7.8% of patients, respectively. Methotrexate or azathioprine with a corticosteroid/hydroxychloroquine were received by 4.2% of patients. Changes in therapy, except discontinuations, were rare. Compared with the minimally treated cluster, those that received corticosteroid monotherapy (mean dose, >12.0 mg/d) had poorer clinical and economic outcomes; the hydroxychloroquine-monotherapy cluster had similar or better outcomes; and patients who received a corticosteroid/hydroxychloroquine with or without methotrexate or azathioprine demonstrated outcomes that were poorer but that appeared better than those with corticosteroid monotherapy. SLE-related visits with a nonspecialist were common (~45%) and remained unchanged over time despite better clinical and economic outcomes associated with specialist visits.

IMPLICATIONS

This study utilized cluster analysis, an unsupervised machine-learning method, to systematically discern treatment patterns over 4 years and to estimate outcomes associated with the identified treatment patterns. The results suggest that minimal treatment is the most common approach in patients with newly diagnosed SLE. Clinical and economic outcomes are poorest with corticosteroid monotherapy but may improve with the addition of hydroxychloroquine and/or an immunosuppressive agent. A large proportion of SLE care is provided by nonspecialists despite the potential benefits of involving a specialist.

摘要

目的

系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的治疗较为复杂,通常会开具多种药物。本研究的目的是确定初发SLE患者的纵向治疗模式,并评估治疗模式与临床和经济结局之间的关联。

方法

这项回顾性观察队列研究使用美国管理式医疗索赔数据库来识别新诊断的SLE患者,并进行4年的治疗随访。患者年龄≥18岁,在索引日期(首次诊断为SLE的医疗索赔)前12个月和后48个月享有连续的医疗和药房福利。使用k均值聚类分析对纵向治疗模式进行分组。如果每年的处方平均数≥0.05,则将疗法纳入聚类分析。使用多变量回归分析比较各聚类之间的临床和经济结局。

结果

分析了1611例初发SLE患者的数据(91.4%为女性;平均[标准差]年龄为44.5[9.5]岁;56.2%主要由专科医生管理)。羟氯喹和皮质类固醇是最常用的疗法;甲氨蝶呤、硫唑嘌呤和霉酚酸酯也符合纳入聚类分析的标准。确定了10种治疗聚类;最常见的是治疗最少的患者(42.8%)。分别有34.0%、11.2%和7.8%的患者接受羟氯喹单药治疗、皮质类固醇单药治疗以及皮质类固醇/羟氯喹联合治疗。4.2%的患者接受甲氨蝶呤或硫唑嘌呤与皮质类固醇/羟氯喹联合治疗。除停药外疗法的改变很少见。与治疗最少的聚类相比,接受皮质类固醇单药治疗(平均剂量,>12.0mg/d)的患者临床和经济结局较差;羟氯喹单药治疗聚类的结局相似或更好;接受皮质类固醇/羟氯喹联合治疗且联合或不联合甲氨蝶呤或硫唑嘌呤的患者结局较差,但似乎比皮质类固醇单药治疗的患者要好。与非专科医生的SLE相关就诊很常见(约45%),尽管专科就诊与更好的临床和经济结局相关,但随着时间推移保持不变。

启示

本研究利用聚类分析这一无监督机器学习方法,系统地识别4年期间的治疗模式,并评估与所确定治疗模式相关的结局。结果表明,最少治疗是新诊断SLE患者最常见的治疗方法。皮质类固醇单药治疗的临床和经济结局最差,但加用羟氯喹和/或免疫抑制剂可能会改善。尽管专科医生参与可能有益,但很大一部分SLE护理是由非专科医生提供的。

相似文献

1
Longitudinal Treatment Patterns and Associated Outcomes in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.新诊断系统性红斑狼疮患者的纵向治疗模式及相关结局
Clin Ther. 2016 Mar;38(3):610-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.01.016. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
2
Immunosuppressive medication use and risk of herpes zoster (HZ) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): A nationwide case-control study.免疫抑制药物的使用与系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者带状疱疹(HZ)风险的关系:一项全国性病例对照研究。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Jul;75(1):49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.12.059. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
3
Effectiveness and safety of hydroxychloroquine therapy with or without corticosteroid in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.羟氯喹联合或不联合皮质类固醇治疗系统性红斑狼疮患者的有效性和安全性。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2019 Mar;22(3):434-442. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13387. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
4
[Psoriasis and systemic lupus erythematosus: a rare association with specific therapeutic problems].[银屑病与系统性红斑狼疮:一种伴有特定治疗问题的罕见关联]
Ann Med Interne (Paris). 2003 Feb;154(1):3-6.
5
Real-world medication use and economic outcomes in incident systemic lupus erythematosus patients in the United States.美国新诊断系统性红斑狼疮患者的实际用药情况和经济结局。
J Med Econ. 2020 Jan;23(1):1-9. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1678170. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
6
Effect of immunosuppressive therapies on survival of systemic lupus erythematosus: a propensity score analysis of a longitudinal cohort.免疫抑制疗法对系统性红斑狼疮患者生存的影响:一项纵向队列的倾向评分分析
Lupus. 2018 Apr;27(5):722-727. doi: 10.1177/0961203317739129. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
7
Association of systemic lupus erythematosus standard of care immunosuppressants with glucocorticoid use and disease outcomes: a multicentre cohort study.系统性红斑狼疮标准治疗的免疫抑制剂与糖皮质激素的使用及疾病结局的相关性:一项多中心队列研究。
Adv Rheumatol. 2024 May 8;64(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s42358-024-00366-y.
8
Association of patient copayment and medication adherence in systemic lupus erythematosus.患者自付额与系统性红斑狼疮药物依从性的关联。
Lupus Sci Med. 2023 Oct;10(2). doi: 10.1136/lupus-2023-000966.
9
A Retrospective Administrative Claims Database Evaluation of the Utilization of Belimumab in US Managed Care Settings.一项对贝利尤单抗在美国管理式医疗环境中使用情况的回顾性行政索赔数据库评估。
Clin Ther. 2015 Dec 1;37(12):2852-63. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
10
Mycophenolate Mofetil and New-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Randomized Clinical Trial.霉酚酸酯与新发系统性红斑狼疮:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2432131. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32131.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporal trends in glucocorticoids and hydroxychloroquine for treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus in Sweden.瑞典糖皮质激素和羟氯喹治疗系统性红斑狼疮的时间趋势
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Aug 1;64(8):4622-4630. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaf192.
2
Outcomes of Patients Newly-diagnosed with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Managed in a Tertiary Training and Referral Hospital in the Philippines.在菲律宾一家三级培训和转诊医院接受治疗的新诊断系统性红斑狼疮患者的治疗结果。
Acta Med Philipp. 2024 Feb 28;58(3):15-22. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.5896. eCollection 2024.
3
Systemic lupus in the era of machine learning medicine.
机器学习医学时代的系统性红斑狼疮。
Lupus Sci Med. 2024 Mar 4;11(1):e001140. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2023-001140.
4
The Impact of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus-Related Respiratory Manifestations on the Quality of Life and Psychological Health of Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间系统性红斑狼疮相关呼吸道表现对患者生活质量和心理健康的影响
Cureus. 2023 Apr 29;15(4):e38282. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38282. eCollection 2023 Apr.
5
Clinical characterization of a cohort of patients treated for systemic lupus erythematosus in Colombia: A retrospective study.对在哥伦比亚接受系统性红斑狼疮治疗的患者队列进行的临床特征描述:一项回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 May 18;18(5):e0285889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285889. eCollection 2023.
6
Machine learning identifies clusters of longitudinal autoantibody profiles predictive of systemic lupus erythematosus disease outcomes.机器学习可识别出纵向自身抗体谱聚类,这些聚类可预测系统性红斑狼疮的疾病结局。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Jul;82(7):927-936. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-223808. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
7
Application of Machine Learning Models in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.机器学习模型在系统性红斑狼疮中的应用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Feb 24;24(5):4514. doi: 10.3390/ijms24054514.
8
Update on prevalence of diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by major health insurance types in the US in 2016.2016 年美国按主要健康保险类型划分的确诊系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患病率更新。
BMC Res Notes. 2022 Jan 9;15(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13104-021-05877-1.
9
Disease and economic burden increase with systemic lupus erythematosus severity 1 year before and after diagnosis: a real-world cohort study, United States, 2004-2015.疾病和经济负担随着红斑狼疮严重程度在诊断前后 1 年增加:美国 2004-2015 年真实世界队列研究。
Lupus Sci Med. 2021 Sep;8(1). doi: 10.1136/lupus-2021-000503.
10
Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacoepidemiology: A Systematic Review. Part 1-Overview of Knowledge Discovery Techniques in Artificial Intelligence.药物流行病学中的人工智能:系统评价。第1部分——人工智能中的知识发现技术概述。
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Jul 16;11:1028. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01028. eCollection 2020.