Jones Thomas W, Howatson Glyn, Russell Mark, French Duncan N
1ASPIRE, Academy for Sports Excellence, Doha, Qatar;2Department of Sport, Exercise, and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom;3Water Research Group, School of Environmental Sciences and Development, North West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa; and4English Institute of Sport, Sportcity, Manchester, United Kingdom.
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Mar;30(3):693-702. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001135.
The present study examined functional strength and endocrine responses to varying ratios of strength and endurance training in a concurrent training regimen. Thirty resistance trained men completed 6 weeks of 3 d·wk of (a) strength training (ST), (b) concurrent strength and endurance training ratio 3:1 (CT3), (c) concurrent strength and endurance training ratio 1:1 (CT1), or (d) no training (CON). Strength training was conducted using whole-body multijoint exercises, whereas endurance training consisted of treadmill running. Assessments of maximal strength, lower-body power, and endocrine factors were conducted pretraining and after 3 and 6 weeks. After the intervention, ST and CT3 elicited similar increases in lower-body strength; furthermore, ST resulted in greater increases than CT1 and CON (all p ≤ 0.05). All training conditions resulted in similar increases in upper-body strength after training. The ST group observed greater increases in lower-body power than all other conditions (all p ≤ 0.05). After the final training session, CT1 elicited greater increases in cortisol than ST (p = 0.008). When implemented as part of a concurrent training regimen, higher volumes of endurance training result in the inhibition of lower-body strength, whereas low volumes do not. Lower-body power was attenuated by high and low frequencies of endurance training. Higher frequencies of endurance training resulted in increased cortisol responses to training. These data suggest that if strength development is the primary focus of a training intervention, frequency of endurance training should remain low.
本研究考察了在同时进行的训练方案中,不同强度与耐力训练比例对功能力量和内分泌反应的影响。30名经过抗阻训练的男性完成了为期6周、每周3天的训练,训练内容包括:(a) 力量训练(ST),(b) 力量与耐力训练比例为3:1的同时训练(CT3),(c) 力量与耐力训练比例为1:1的同时训练(CT1),或 (d) 无训练(CON)。力量训练采用全身多关节练习,而耐力训练则为跑步机跑步。在训练前以及训练3周和6周后,对最大力量、下肢功率和内分泌因素进行了评估。干预后,ST和CT3在下肢力量方面引起了相似的增加;此外,ST导致的增加幅度大于CT1和CON(所有p≤0.05)。所有训练条件在训练后上肢力量的增加方面相似。ST组观察到下肢功率的增加幅度大于所有其他条件(所有p≤0.05)。在最后一次训练后,CT1引起的皮质醇增加幅度大于ST(p = 0.008)。当作为同时训练方案的一部分实施时,较高量的耐力训练会抑制下肢力量,而低量则不会。高频率和低频率的耐力训练都会削弱下肢功率。较高频率的耐力训练会导致训练引起的皮质醇反应增加。这些数据表明,如果力量发展是训练干预的主要重点,耐力训练的频率应保持较低。