• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

康复工作者投入对低视力个体视觉功能结局的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

Effect of rehabilitation worker input on visual function outcomes in individuals with low vision: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Acton Jennifer H, Molik Bablin, Binns Alison, Court Helen, Margrain Tom H

机构信息

School of Optometry & Vision Sciences, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Maindy Road, Cardiff, CF24 4HQ, Wales, UK.

Division of Optometry, School of Health Sciences, City University London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB, England, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2016 Feb 24;17(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1235-2.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-016-1235-2
PMID:26908153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4765130/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Visual Rehabilitation Officers help people with a visual impairment maintain their independence. This intervention adopts a flexible, goal-centred approach, which may include training in mobility, use of optical and non-optical aids, and performance of activities of daily living. Although Visual Rehabilitation Officers are an integral part of the low vision service in the United Kingdom, evidence that they are effective is lacking. The purpose of this exploratory trial is to estimate the impact of a Visual Rehabilitation Officer on self-reported visual function, psychosocial and quality-of-life outcomes in individuals with low vision.

METHODS/DESIGN: In this exploratory, assessor-masked, parallel group, randomised controlled trial, participants will be allocated either to receive home visits from a Visual Rehabilitation Officer (n = 30) or to a waiting list control group (n = 30) in a 1:1 ratio. Adult volunteers with a visual impairment, who have been identified as needing rehabilitation officer input by a social worker, will take part. Those with an urgent need for a Visual Rehabilitation Officer or who have a cognitive impairment will be excluded. The primary outcome measure will be self-reported visual function (48-item Veterans Affairs Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire). Secondary outcome measures will include psychological and quality-of-life metrics: the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS), the Adjustment to Age-related Visual Loss Scale (AVL-12), the Standardised Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D) and the UCLA Loneliness Scale. The interviewer collecting the outcomes will be masked to the group allocations. The analysis will be undertaken on a complete case and intention-to-treat basis. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) will be applied to follow-up questionnaire scores, with the baseline score as a covariate.

DISCUSSION

This trial is expected to provide robust effect size estimates of the intervention effect. The data will be used to design a large-scale randomised controlled trial to evaluate fully the Visual Rehabilitation Officer intervention. A rigorous evaluation of Rehabilitation Officer input is vital to direct a future low vision rehabilitation strategy and to help direct government resources.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered with ( ISRCTN44807874 ) on 9 March 2015.

摘要

背景

视觉康复官帮助视力受损者维持其独立性。该干预措施采用灵活的、以目标为中心的方法,可能包括行动能力训练、光学和非光学辅助器具的使用以及日常生活活动的执行。尽管视觉康复官是英国低视力服务的一个组成部分,但缺乏其有效性的证据。这项探索性试验的目的是评估视觉康复官对低视力个体自我报告的视觉功能、心理社会和生活质量结果的影响。

方法/设计:在这项探索性、评估者盲法、平行组随机对照试验中,参与者将按1:1的比例被分配接受视觉康复官的家访(n = 30)或进入等候名单对照组(n = 30)。由社会工作者确定需要康复官介入的成年视力受损志愿者将参与。急需视觉康复官或有认知障碍的人将被排除。主要结局指标将是自我报告的视觉功能(48项退伍军人事务部低视力视觉功能问卷)。次要结局指标将包括心理和生活质量指标:患者健康问卷(PHQ - 9)、沃里克 - 爱丁堡心理健康量表(WEMWBS)、与年龄相关视力丧失调整量表(AVL - 12)、标准化健康相关生活质量问卷(EQ - 5D)和加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独感量表。收集结局的访谈者将对分组情况保持盲态。分析将基于完整病例和意向性分析进行。协方差分析(ANCOVA)将应用于随访问卷得分,以基线得分作为协变量。

讨论

预计该试验将提供干预效果的可靠效应量估计。这些数据将用于设计一项大规模随机对照试验,以全面评估视觉康复官干预措施。对康复官介入进行严格评估对于指导未来的低视力康复策略和帮助指导政府资源至关重要。

试验注册

该试验于2015年3月9日在(ISRCTN44807874)注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/516e/4765130/c25fa7b39317/13063_2016_1235_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/516e/4765130/c25fa7b39317/13063_2016_1235_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/516e/4765130/c25fa7b39317/13063_2016_1235_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of rehabilitation worker input on visual function outcomes in individuals with low vision: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.康复工作者投入对低视力个体视觉功能结局的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Feb 24;17(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1235-2.
2
Effect of a Home Visit-Based Low Vision Rehabilitation Intervention on Visual Function Outcomes: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial.基于家访的低视力康复干预对视觉功能结果的影响:一项探索性随机对照试验。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Dec 1;57(15):6662-6667. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19901.
3
Outcomes of the Veterans Affairs Low Vision Intervention Trial (LOVIT).退伍军人事务部低视力干预试验(LOVIT)的结果。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 May;126(5):608-17. doi: 10.1001/archopht.126.5.608.
4
The effectiveness of low-vision rehabilitation in 2 cohorts derived from the veterans affairs Low-Vision Intervention Trial.源自退伍军人事务部低视力干预试验的2个队列中低视力康复的有效性。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep;130(9):1162-8. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.1820.
5
Rehabilitation needs and activity limitations of adults with a visual impairment entering a low vision rehabilitation service in England.英格兰视力障碍成年人进入低视力康复服务机构后的康复需求及活动受限情况
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019 Mar;39(2):113-126. doi: 10.1111/opo.12606.
6
The Veterans Affairs Low Vision Intervention Trial (LOVIT): design and methodology.退伍军人事务部低视力干预试验(LOVIT):设计与方法
Clin Trials. 2007;4(6):650-60. doi: 10.1177/1740774507085274.
7
The p-EVES study design and methodology: a randomised controlled trial to compare portable electronic vision enhancement systems (p-EVES) to optical magnifiers for near vision activities in visual impairment.便携式电子视觉增强系统(p-EVES)研究设计与方法:一项随机对照试验,用于比较便携式电子视觉增强系统(p-EVES)与光学放大镜在视力障碍者近视力活动中的效果。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014 Sep;34(5):558-72. doi: 10.1111/opo.12149. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
8
Veterans Affairs Low-vision Intervention Trial II: One-year Follow-up.退伍军人事务部低视力干预试验II:一年随访
Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Oct;96(10):718-725. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001428.
9
Outcomes of Multidisciplinary Low Vision Rehabilitation in Adults.成人多学科低视力康复的效果
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Nov;56(12):7451-61. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-16892.
10
Economic Evaluation of Low-Vision Rehabilitation for Veterans With Macular Diseases in the US Department of Veterans Affairs.美国退伍军人事务部黄斑疾病低视力康复的经济评价。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 May 1;136(5):524-531. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.0797.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-management interventions for quality of life in adults with visual impairment.针对视力受损成年人生活质量的自我管理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 10;2(2):CD015790. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015790.pub2.
2
Interventions to improve outdoor mobility among people living with disabilities: A systematic review.改善残疾人户外出行能力的干预措施:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 14;20(2):e1407. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1407. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults.

本文引用的文献

1
Stepped care for depression and anxiety in visually impaired older adults: multicentre randomised controlled trial.视障老年人抑郁和焦虑的阶梯式护理:多中心随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2015 Nov 23;351:h6127. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6127.
2
Coping style and quality of life in elderly patients with vision disturbances.视力障碍老年患者的应对方式与生活质量
J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:584627. doi: 10.1155/2014/584627. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
3
Quality assessment of ophthalmic questionnaires: review and recommendations.眼科问卷的质量评估:综述与建议
低视力康复改善视力受损成年人的生活质量。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 27;1(1):CD006543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006543.pub2.
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Aug;90(8):720-44. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000001.
4
Responsiveness of the EQ-5D to the effects of low vision rehabilitation.EQ-5D对低视力康复效果的反应性。
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Aug;90(8):799-805. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000005.
5
Cross cultural evaluation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) --a mixed methods study.跨文化评价沃里克-爱丁堡心理健康量表(WEMWBS)——一项混合方法研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Feb 27;11:27. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-27.
6
The impact of visual and nonvisual factors on quality of life and adaptation in adults with visual impairment.视觉和非视觉因素对视力障碍成年人生活质量和适应能力的影响。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jun 28;53(7):4234-41. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9580.
7
How effective is low vision service provision? A systematic review.低视力服务提供的效果如何?系统评价。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan-Feb;57(1):34-65. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2011.06.006. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
8
How effective is the new community-based Welsh low vision service?新的基于社区的威尔士低视力服务有多有效?
Br J Ophthalmol. 2011 Feb;95(2):178-84. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2010.179606. Epub 2010 Jul 3.
9
The newly established primary care based Welsh Low Vision Service is effective and has improved access to low vision services in Wales.新成立的基于初级保健的威尔士低视力服务是有效的,并改善了威尔士低视力服务的可及性。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010 Jul;30(4):358-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00729.x. Epub 2010 May 12.
10
Vision self-management for older adults: a randomised controlled trial.老年人视觉自我管理:一项随机对照试验。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Feb;94(2):223-8. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.147538.