Ogata Hitomi, Kobayashi Fumi, Hibi Masanobu, Tanaka Shigeho, Tokuyama Kumpei
Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Science, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Physiol Rep. 2016 Feb;4(4). doi: 10.14814/phy2.12717.
The thermic effect of food (TEF) is the well-known concept in spite of its difficulty for measuring. The gold standard for evaluating the TEF is the difference in energy expenditure between fed and fasting states (ΔEE). Alternatively, energy expenditure at 0 activity (EE0) is estimated from the intercept of the linear relationship between energy expenditure and physical activity to eliminate activity thermogenesis from the measurement, and the TEF is calculated as the difference between EE0 and postabsorptive resting metabolic rate (RMR) or sleeping metabolic rate (SMR). However, the accuracy of the alternative methods has been questioned. To improve TEF estimation, we propose a novel method as our original TEF calculation method to calculate EE0 using integrated physical activity over a specific time interval. We aimed to identify which alternative methods of TEF calculation returns reasonable estimates, that is, positive value as well as estimates close to ΔEE. Seven men participated in two sessions (with and without breakfast) of whole-body indirect calorimetry, and physical activity was monitored with a triaxial accelerometer. Estimates of TEF by three simplified methods were compared to ΔEE. ΔEE, EE0 above SMR, and our original method returned positive values for the TEF after breakfast in all measurements. TEF estimates of our original method was indistinguishable from those based on the ΔEE, whereas those as EE0 above RMR and EE0 above SMR were slightly lower and higher, respectively. Our original method was the best among the three simplified TEF methods as it provided positive estimates in all the measurements that were close to the value derived from gold standard for all measurements.
食物热效应(TEF)是一个广为人知的概念,尽管其测量存在困难。评估TEF的金标准是进食状态和空腹状态之间的能量消耗差异(ΔEE)。另外,通过能量消耗与身体活动之间线性关系的截距来估计零活动时的能量消耗(EE0),以从测量中消除活动产热,然后将TEF计算为EE0与吸收后静息代谢率(RMR)或睡眠代谢率(SMR)之间的差异。然而,这些替代方法的准确性受到了质疑。为了改进TEF估计,我们提出了一种新颖的方法作为我们原始的TEF计算方法,即使用特定时间间隔内的综合身体活动来计算EE0。我们旨在确定哪种TEF计算的替代方法能得出合理的估计值,也就是正值以及接近ΔEE的估计值。七名男性参加了全身间接测热法的两个实验环节(有早餐和无早餐),并使用三轴加速度计监测身体活动。将三种简化方法对TEF的估计值与ΔEE进行了比较。在所有测量中,ΔEE、高于SMR的EE0以及我们的原始方法在早餐后得出的TEF均为正值。我们原始方法对TEF的估计值与基于ΔEE的估计值没有区别,而高于RMR的EE0和高于SMR的EE0得出的估计值分别略低和略高。我们的原始方法是三种简化TEF方法中最好的,因为它在所有测量中都提供了正值估计,且接近所有测量中从金标准得出的值。