Davalieva Katarina, Maleva Kostovska Ivana, Dwork Andrew J
Research Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology "Georgi D Efremov," Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts Skopje, Republic of Macedonia.
Department of Molecular Imaging and Neuropathology, New York State Psychiatric InstituteNew York, NY, USA; Departments of Psychiatry and Pathology and Cell Biology, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia UniversityNew York, NY, USA; Macedonian Academy of Sciences and ArtsSkopje, Republic of Macedonia.
Front Cell Neurosci. 2016 Feb 16;10:18. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2016.00018. eCollection 2016.
Despite intense scientific efforts, the neuropathology and pathophysiology of schizophrenia are poorly understood. Proteomic studies, by testing large numbers of proteins for associations with disease, may contribute to the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia. They may also indicate the types and locations of cells most likely to harbor pathological alterations. Investigations using proteomic approaches have already provided much information on quantitative and qualitative protein patterns in postmortem brain tissue, peripheral tissues and body fluids. Different proteomic technologies such as 2-D PAGE, 2-D DIGE, SELDI-TOF, shotgun proteomics with label-based (ICAT), and label-free (MS(E)) quantification have been applied to the study of schizophrenia for the past 15 years. This review summarizes the results, mostly from brain but also from other tissues and bodily fluids, of proteomics studies in schizophrenia. Emphasis is given to proteomics platforms, varying sources of material, proposed candidate biomarkers emerging from comparative proteomics studies, and the specificity of the putative markers in terms of other mental illnesses. We also compare proteins altered in schizophrenia with reports of protein or mRNA sequences that are relatively enriched in specific cell types. While proteomic studies of schizophrenia find abnormalities in the expression of many proteins that are not cell type-specific, there appears to be a disproportionate representation of proteins whose synthesis and localization are highly enriched in one or more brain cell type compared with other types of brain cells. Two of the three proteins most commonly altered in schizophrenia are aldolase C and glial fibrillary acidic protein, astrocytic proteins with entirely different functions, but the studies are approximately evenly divided with regard to the direction of the differences and the concordance or discordance between the two proteins. Alterations of common myelin-associated proteins were also frequently observed, and in four studies that identified alterations in at least two, all differences were downwards in schizophrenia, consistent with earlier studies examining RNA or targeting myelin-associated proteins.
尽管进行了大量科学研究,但精神分裂症的神经病理学和病理生理学仍未得到充分理解。蛋白质组学研究通过检测大量蛋白质与疾病的关联,可能有助于理解精神分裂症的分子机制。它们还可能指出最有可能存在病理改变的细胞类型和位置。使用蛋白质组学方法的研究已经提供了关于死后脑组织、外周组织和体液中蛋白质定量和定性模式的大量信息。在过去15年中,不同的蛋白质组学技术,如二维聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(2-D PAGE)、二维差异凝胶电泳(2-D DIGE)、表面增强激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(SELDI-TOF)、基于标签(同位素亲和标签,ICAT)和无标签(质谱/质谱,MS(E))定量的鸟枪法蛋白质组学,已应用于精神分裂症的研究。本综述总结了精神分裂症蛋白质组学研究的结果,这些结果大多来自大脑,但也来自其他组织和体液。重点介绍了蛋白质组学平台、不同的材料来源、比较蛋白质组学研究中提出的候选生物标志物,以及这些假定标志物相对于其他精神疾病的特异性。我们还将精神分裂症中发生改变的蛋白质与在特定细胞类型中相对富集的蛋白质或mRNA序列的报道进行了比较。虽然精神分裂症的蛋白质组学研究发现许多蛋白质的表达异常并非细胞类型特异性的,但与其他类型的脑细胞相比,其合成和定位在一种或多种脑细胞类型中高度富集的蛋白质的比例似乎过高。精神分裂症中最常发生改变的三种蛋白质中有两种是醛缩酶C和胶质纤维酸性蛋白,它们是具有完全不同功能的星形细胞蛋白,但在差异方向以及这两种蛋白质之间的一致性或不一致性方面,研究结果大致平分秋色。常见的髓鞘相关蛋白的改变也经常被观察到,并且在四项至少鉴定出两种改变的研究中,精神分裂症中的所有差异都是下调的,这与早期检查RNA或靶向髓鞘相关蛋白的研究一致。