Russell Kent, Clemons Mark, Costa Luis, Addison Christina L
Division of Medical Oncology, Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Division of Medical Oncology, Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
J Bone Oncol. 2012 May 24;1(1):12-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2012.04.003. eCollection 2012 Jun.
Bisphosphonates have demonstrated anti-tumour activity in preclinical studies of bone metastatic disease, thus it was natural to transition these agents into the adjuvant cancer therapy setting. Surprisingly, the results of adjuvant breast cancer trials have shown either modest to no benefit or even harm. We sought to explore whether the preclinical results supporting bisphosphonate use provided clues to help explain the current clinical data. Interestingly, the majority of preclinical data suggested that bisphosphonate treatment was more efficacious when administered after the establishment of osseous metastases. This is similar to the findings of one clinical study whereby patients with biopsy evidence of osseous micrometastases derive greater survival benefit from bisphosphonate treatment. Another clinical study found bisphosphonates were associated with increased incidence of visceral metastases, similar to what has been previously published in preclinical models using "preventative" dosing strategies. While the current clinical data suggest bisphosphonates may be more efficacious in post-menopausal or oestrogen depleted patients, or those with hormone receptor positive tumours, to date no appropriately designed preclinical studies have evaluated these effects. Furthermore, putative mechanisms that regulate response to bisphosphonates in other tumour types remain to be evaluated in breast cancer. Despite the initial optimism regarding adjuvant bisphosphonate therapy, the conflicting clinical results from large trials suggest that we should return to the bench to further investigate factors that may influence response to bisphosphonate treatment or identify appropriate characteristics that would indicate the sub-groups of patients most likely to benefit from bisphosphonate treatment.
双膦酸盐类药物在骨转移疾病的临床前研究中已显示出抗肿瘤活性,因此将这些药物过渡到辅助性癌症治疗领域是很自然的。令人惊讶的是,辅助性乳腺癌试验的结果显示,要么益处不大或没有益处,甚至还有危害。我们试图探究支持使用双膦酸盐类药物的临床前研究结果是否能为解释当前的临床数据提供线索。有趣的是,大多数临床前数据表明,在骨转移确立后给予双膦酸盐治疗更有效。这与一项临床研究的结果相似,该研究发现有骨微转移活检证据的患者从双膦酸盐治疗中获得了更大的生存益处。另一项临床研究发现,双膦酸盐类药物与内脏转移发生率增加有关,这与之前在使用“预防性”给药策略的临床前模型中发表的结果相似。虽然目前的临床数据表明双膦酸盐类药物在绝经后或雌激素缺乏的患者,或激素受体阳性肿瘤患者中可能更有效,但迄今为止,尚无经过适当设计的临床前研究评估这些效果。此外,调节其他肿瘤类型对双膦酸盐类药物反应的假定机制仍有待在乳腺癌中进行评估。尽管最初对辅助性双膦酸盐治疗持乐观态度,但大型试验相互矛盾的临床结果表明,我们应该回到实验室,进一步研究可能影响双膦酸盐治疗反应的因素,或确定能够表明最可能从双膦酸盐治疗中获益的患者亚组的合适特征。