Foodborne, Waterborne, Vectorborne and Zoonotic Diseases Section.
Public Health Laboratory, Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016 Jan 18;3(1):ofw003. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofw003. eCollection 2016 Jan.
Background. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) are not detected by conventional culture methods. The prevalence of ETEC infections in the United States is unknown, and recognized cases are primarily associated with foreign travel. Gaps remain in our understanding of STEC epidemiology. Methods. Two sentinel surveillance sites were enrolled: an urban health maintenance organization laboratory (Laboratory A) and a rural hospital laboratory (Laboratory B). Residual sorbitol MacConkey (SMAC) plates from stool cultures performed at Laboratory A (1996-2006) and Laboratory B (2000-2008) were collected. Colony sweeps from SMAC plates were tested for genes encoding STEC toxins stx1 and stx2 (1996-2008) and ETEC heat-labile and heat-stable toxins eltB, estA 1, 2 and 3 (2000-2008) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays. Results. In Laboratory A, a bacterial pathogen was identified in 7.0% of 21 970 specimens. During 1996-2006, Campylobacter was the most common bacterial pathogen (2.7% of cultures), followed by Salmonella (1.2%), Shigella (1.0%), and STEC (0.9%). Among STEC (n = 196), O157 was the most common serogroup (31%). During 2000-2006, ETEC (1.9%) was the second most common bacterial pathogen after Campylobacter (2.6%). In Laboratory B, of 19 293 specimens tested, a bacterial pathogen was identified for 5.5%, including Campylobacter (2.1%), STEC (1.3%), Salmonella (1.0%), and ETEC (0.8%). Among STEC (n = 253), O157 was the leading serogroup (35%). Among ETEC cases, 61% traveled internationally. Conclusions. Enterotoxigenic E. coli and STEC infections were as common as most other enteric bacterial pathogens, and ETEC may be detected more frequently by culture-independent multiplex PCR diagnostic methods. A high proportion of ETEC cases were domestically acquired.
肠产毒性大肠杆菌(ETEC)和非 O157 型志贺毒素产生大肠杆菌(STEC)不能通过常规培养方法检测到。美国的 ETEC 感染患病率尚不清楚,已知病例主要与国外旅行有关。我们对 STEC 流行病学的认识仍存在差距。方法:两个哨点监测点入组:城市卫生维护组织实验室(实验室 A)和农村医院实验室(实验室 B)。收集实验室 A(1996-2006 年)和实验室 B(2000-2008 年)粪便培养的残余山梨醇麦康凯(SMAC)平板。通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测 SMAC 平板上的细菌进行stx1 和 stx2 编码基因(1996-2008 年)和 ETEC 不耐热和耐热毒素 eltB、estA1、2 和 3(2000-2008 年)的基因。结果:在实验室 A,21970 份标本中有 7.0%检出细菌病原体。1996-2006 年,弯曲杆菌是最常见的细菌病原体(培养物的 2.7%),其次是沙门氏菌(1.2%)、志贺氏菌(1.0%)和 STEC(0.9%)。在 STEC(n=196)中,O157 是最常见的血清群(31%)。2000-2006 年,ETEC(1.9%)是继弯曲杆菌(2.6%)之后第二常见的细菌病原体。在实验室 B,在检测的 19293 份标本中,有 5.5%检出细菌病原体,包括弯曲杆菌(2.1%)、STEC(1.3%)、沙门氏菌(1.0%)和 ETEC(0.8%)。在 STEC(n=253)中,O157 是主要血清群(35%)。在 ETEC 病例中,61%有国际旅行史。结论:肠产毒性大肠杆菌和 STEC 感染与大多数其他肠道细菌病原体一样常见,并且通过非依赖培养的多重 PCR 诊断方法可能更频繁地检测到 ETEC。ETEC 病例中有很大一部分是国内获得的。