• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施和运行快速反应系统的局限性。

The limitations in implementing and operating a rapid response system.

作者信息

Subramaniam A, Botha J, Tiruvoipati R

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Frankston Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Intern Med J. 2016 Oct;46(10):1139-1145. doi: 10.1111/imj.13042.

DOI:10.1111/imj.13042
PMID:26913367
Abstract

Despite the widespread introduction of rapid response systems (RRS)/medical emergency teams (MET), there is still controversy regarding how effective they are. While there are some observational studies showing improved outcomes with RRS, there are no data from randomised controlled trials to support the effectiveness. Nevertheless, the MET system has become a standard of care in many healthcare organisations. In this review, we present an overview of the limitations in implementing and operating a RRS in modern healthcare.

摘要

尽管快速反应系统(RRS)/医疗急救团队(MET)已广泛引入,但关于其有效性仍存在争议。虽然有一些观察性研究表明RRS可改善治疗结果,但尚无随机对照试验的数据支持其有效性。尽管如此,MET系统已成为许多医疗机构的护理标准。在本综述中,我们概述了现代医疗保健中实施和运行RRS的局限性。

相似文献

1
The limitations in implementing and operating a rapid response system.实施和运行快速反应系统的局限性。
Intern Med J. 2016 Oct;46(10):1139-1145. doi: 10.1111/imj.13042.
2
The role of the non-ICU staff nurse on a medical emergency team: perceptions and understanding.非 ICU 护士在医疗急救团队中的作用:认知与理解。
Am J Nurs. 2011 May;111(5):22-9; quiz 30-1. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000398045.00299.64.
3
What stops hospital clinical staff from following protocols? An analysis of the incidence and factors behind the failure of bedside clinical staff to activate the rapid response system in a multi-campus Australian metropolitan healthcare service.医院临床人员不遵守规程的原因是什么?对澳大利亚多校区大都市医疗服务机构床边临床人员未能启动快速反应系统的事件发生率及背后因素进行分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jul;21(7):569-75. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000692. Epub 2012 May 23.
4
Effect of a 2-tier rapid response system on patient outcome and staff satisfaction.两级快速反应系统对患者结局及工作人员满意度的影响。
Aust Crit Care. 2015 Aug;28(3):107-14; quiz 115. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2014.10.044. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
5
A national quality improvement initiative for reducing harm and death from sepsis in Wales.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2015 Apr;31(2):100-5. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2014.11.004. Epub 2015 Jan 17.
6
Regular in-situ simulation training of paediatric Medical Emergency Team leads to sustained improvements in hospital response to deteriorating patients, improved outcomes in intensive care and financial savings.定期对儿科医疗急救团队进行现场模拟培训,可持续提高医院对病情恶化患者的反应能力,改善重症监护的治疗效果,并节省财务成本。
Resuscitation. 2017 Jun;115:61-67. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.03.031. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
7
Critical care clinician perceptions of factors leading to Medical Emergency Team review.危重病临床医生对导致医疗应急小组审查的因素的看法。
Aust Crit Care. 2018 Mar;31(2):87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 May 5.
8
Performance of the efferent limb of a rapid response system: an observational study of medical emergency team calls.快速反应系统传出环节的效能:对医疗急救团队呼叫的一项观察性研究
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Sep 17;23:69. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0153-8.
9
[Effect of emergency intervention team still unclear. More evidence is necessary].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155(18):A3500.
10
The 6 "ws" of rapid response systems: best practices for improving development, implementation, and evaluation.快速反应系统的6个“W”:改进开发、实施和评估的最佳实践。
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2014 Apr-Jun;37(2):207-18. doi: 10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000020.

引用本文的文献

1
Critical care outreach teams: a service without walls.重症监护外展团队:一项无边界的服务。
Intensive Care Med. 2023 May;49(5):572-574. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07021-y. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
2
Clinical Sign-Based Rapid Response Team Call Criteria for Identifying Patients Requiring Intensive Care Management in Japan.日本基于临床体征的快速反应团队呼叫标准,用于识别需要重症监护管理的患者。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Nov 2;57(11):1194. doi: 10.3390/medicina57111194.
3
'Code-95' rapid response calls for patients under airborne precautions in the COVID-19-era: a cross-sectional survey of healthcare worker perceptions.
新冠疫情时期针对采取空气传播防护措施患者的“95 号代码”快速反应呼叫:医护人员认知情况的横断面调查。
Intern Med J. 2021 Apr;51(4):494-505. doi: 10.1111/imj.15145.
4
Predictive powers of the Modified Early Warning Score and the National Early Warning Score in general ward patients who activated the medical emergency team.改良早期预警评分和国家早期预警评分在激活医疗急救团队的普通病房患者中的预测能力。
PLoS One. 2020 May 14;15(5):e0233078. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233078. eCollection 2020.