• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内隐人工语法学习中的P600效应

The P600 in Implicit Artificial Grammar Learning.

作者信息

Silva Susana, Folia Vasiliki, Hagoort Peter, Petersson Karl Magnus

机构信息

Cognitive Neuroscience Research Group, Centre for Biomedical Research (CBMR), University of Algarve.

Neurocognition and Language Group, Center for Psychology at the University of Porto.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2017 Jan;41(1):137-157. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12343. Epub 2016 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1111/cogs.12343
PMID:26913833
Abstract

The suitability of the artificial grammar learning (AGL) paradigm to capture relevant aspects of the acquisition of linguistic structures has been empirically tested in a number of EEG studies. Some have shown a syntax-related P600 component, but it has not been ruled out that the AGL P600 effect is a response to surface features (e.g., subsequence familiarity) rather than the underlying syntax structure. Therefore, in this study, we controlled for the surface characteristics of the test sequences (associative chunk strength) and recorded the EEG before (baseline preference classification) and after (preference and grammaticality classification) exposure to a grammar. After exposure, a typical, centroparietal P600 effect was elicited by grammatical violations and not by unfamiliar subsequences, suggesting that the AGL P600 effect signals a response to structural irregularities. Moreover, preference and grammaticality classification showed a qualitatively similar ERP profile, strengthening the idea that the implicit structural mere-exposure paradigm in combination with preference classification is a suitable alternative to the traditional grammaticality classification test.

摘要

人工语法学习(AGL)范式在捕捉语言结构习得相关方面的适用性已在多项脑电图(EEG)研究中得到实证检验。一些研究显示了与句法相关的P600成分,但并未排除AGL的P600效应是对表面特征(如子序列熟悉度)而非潜在句法结构的反应。因此,在本研究中,我们控制了测试序列的表面特征(联想组块强度),并在接触语法之前(基线偏好分类)和之后(偏好和语法性分类)记录脑电图。接触后,语法违规引发了典型的中央顶叶P600效应,而不熟悉的子序列则未引发该效应,这表明AGL的P600效应表明对结构不规则性有反应。此外,偏好和语法性分类显示出定性相似的事件相关电位(ERP)图谱,强化了这样一种观点,即隐式结构单纯暴露范式与偏好分类相结合是传统语法性分类测试的合适替代方法。

相似文献

1
The P600 in Implicit Artificial Grammar Learning.内隐人工语法学习中的P600效应
Cogn Sci. 2017 Jan;41(1):137-157. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12343. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
2
Modality effects in implicit artificial grammar learning: An EEG study.内隐人工语法学习中的模态效应:一项脑电图研究。
Brain Res. 2018 May 15;1687:50-59. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.02.020. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
3
Implicit learning and dyslexia.内隐学习与阅读障碍
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Dec;1145:132-50. doi: 10.1196/annals.1416.012.
4
An ERP study of structural anomalies in native and semantic free artificial grammar: evidence for shared processing mechanisms.一项关于母语和语义自由人工语法结构异常的 ERP 研究:支持共享加工机制的证据。
Brain Res. 2013 Aug 21;1527:149-60. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.05.022. Epub 2013 May 24.
5
Instruction effects in implicit artificial grammar learning: a preference for grammaticality.内隐人工语法学习中的指令效应:对语法性的偏好。
Brain Res. 2008 Jul 24;1221:80-92. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.05.005. Epub 2008 May 13.
6
Implicit and explicit second language training recruit common neural mechanisms for syntactic processing.内隐和外显的第二语言训练为句法处理招募了共同的神经机制。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Jun;25(6):936-51. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00354. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
7
Implicit structured sequence learning: an fMRI study of the structural mere-exposure effect.内隐结构序列学习:结构单纯暴露效应的 fMRI 研究。
Front Psychol. 2014 Feb 4;5:41. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00041. eCollection 2014.
8
Brain responses before and after intensive second language learning: proficiency based changes and first language background effects in adult learners.强化第二语言学习前后的大脑反应:成年学习者的熟练度变化和母语背景效应。
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52318. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052318. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
9
What artificial grammar learning reveals about the neurobiology of syntax.人工语法学习揭示的句法神经生物学。
Brain Lang. 2012 Feb;120(2):83-95. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.08.003. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
10
First Language Attrition Induces Changes in Online Morphosyntactic Processing and Re-Analysis: An ERP Study of Number Agreement in Complex Italian Sentences.母语 attrition 引发在线形态句法加工及重新分析的变化:一项关于复杂意大利语句子中数的一致性的事件相关电位研究 。 注:这里“attrition”直译为“损耗”,在语言学语境中可意译为“消退”等,这里保留英文是因为不确定更准确的意译表述。如果有更准确的专业术语要求,可进一步调整。
Cogn Sci. 2017 Sep;41(7):1760-1803. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12450. Epub 2016 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural Processing of Speech Sounds in Autistic Kindergarteners as a Predictor of Reading Outcomes.自闭症幼儿语音的神经处理作为阅读结果的预测指标
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Nov 23. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06638-2.
2
Statistical Learning Among Preschoolers With and Without Developmental Language Disorder: Examining Effects of Language Status, Age, and Prior Learning.学龄前儿童语言发展障碍与无语言发展障碍者的统计学习:检验语言状况、年龄和先前学习的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Sep 12;67(9):3081-3093. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00602. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
3
Can adults learn L2 grammar after prolonged exposure under incidental conditions?
成年人在偶然条件下长期接触后能否学习第二语言语法?
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 26;18(7):e0288989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288989. eCollection 2023.
4
Which Cognitive Factors Predict L2 Grammar Learning: Cognitive Control, Statistical Learning, Working Memory, or Attention?哪些认知因素能够预测二语语法学习:认知控制、统计学习、工作记忆还是注意力?
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 14;13:943988. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.943988. eCollection 2022.
5
Different Neural Responses for Unfinished Sentence as a Conventional Indirect Refusal Between Native and Non-native Speakers: An Event-Related Potential Study.母语者与非母语者之间作为传统间接拒绝方式的未完成句子的不同神经反应:一项事件相关电位研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 3;13:806023. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.806023. eCollection 2022.
6
The Behavioral and ERP Responses to Self- and Other- Referenced Adjectives.对自我参照和他人参照形容词的行为及事件相关电位反应
Brain Sci. 2020 Oct 27;10(11):782. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10110782.