• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用三维计算机辅助结石体积估计来评估体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石的效果。

Using a three-dimensional computer assisted stone volume estimates to evaluate extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy treatment of kidney stones.

作者信息

Bigum Lene Hyldgaard, Ulriksen Peter Sommer, Omar Omar Salah

机构信息

Department of Urology, Herlev Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.

CT Innovation Unit at Department of Radiology, Herlev Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, Herlev, Denmark.

出版信息

Urolithiasis. 2016 Oct;44(5):451-7. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0864-y. Epub 2016 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00240-016-0864-y
PMID:26914829
Abstract

This study describes and evaluates the use of non-contrast enhanced computerized tomography (NCCT) before and after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). Computer measured stone volume was used as an exact measurement for treatment response. 81 patients received SWL of kidney stones at Herlev Hospital between April 2013 and January 2014 and follow-up was possible in 77 (95 %) patients. NCCT was used before and after treatment. Treatment response was expressed as a reduction of the stone volume. Stone characteristics as the stone volumes, HU, SSD and localization were measured by radiologist using a vendor non-specific computer program. Complications, patient characteristics and additional treatment were registered. On average, 5858 shocks were given each patient. The follow-up NCCT was performed 24 days after treatment. It was possible to calculate the stone volume in 88 % of the patients-the remaining 12 % it was not possible due to stone disintegration. The stone free rate was 22 %. The average relative reduction in stone burden was 62 %. Only 8 % of the patients were radiological non-responders. Steinstrasse was observed in 13 (17 %) and 28 (36 %) patients had additional treatment performed. Irradiation dose per NCCT was 2.6 mSv. Stone volume could be calculated in most patients. The relative reduction in stone burden after treatment was 62 %. The stone volume was redundant when evaluating stone free patients, but in cases of partial response it gave an exact quantification, to be used in the further management and follow-up of the patients.

摘要

本研究描述并评估了体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)前后非增强计算机断层扫描(NCCT)的应用。计算机测量的结石体积被用作治疗反应的精确测量指标。2013年4月至2014年1月期间,81例患者在赫勒夫医院接受了肾结石的SWL治疗,77例(95%)患者能够进行随访。治疗前后均使用了NCCT。治疗反应以结石体积的减少来表示。放射科医生使用供应商非特定的计算机程序测量结石特征,如结石体积、HU、SSD和定位。记录并发症、患者特征和额外治疗情况。每位患者平均接受5858次冲击。治疗后24天进行随访NCCT。88%的患者能够计算结石体积,其余12%由于结石崩解无法计算。结石清除率为22%。结石负荷的平均相对减少率为62%。只有8%的患者为放射学无反应者。13例(17%)患者观察到石街形成,28例(36%)患者接受了额外治疗。每次NCCT的辐射剂量为2.6 mSv。大多数患者能够计算结石体积。治疗后结石负荷的相对减少率为62%。在评估结石清除的患者时,结石体积可能多余,但在部分反应的情况下,它能给出精确的量化结果,用于患者的进一步管理和随访。

相似文献

1
Using a three-dimensional computer assisted stone volume estimates to evaluate extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy treatment of kidney stones.使用三维计算机辅助结石体积估计来评估体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石的效果。
Urolithiasis. 2016 Oct;44(5):451-7. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0864-y. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
2
A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study.非增强计算机断层扫描(NCCT)上肾结石密度 970 亨氏单位(HU)的阈值可改善患者对体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)的选择:来自前瞻性研究的证据。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E438-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10964.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
3
A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.高分辨率CT参数预测上尿路结石体外冲击波碎石术成功率的前瞻性评估
J Endourol. 2016 Nov;30(11):1227-1232. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0364. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
4
Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography.通过计算机断层扫描上的皮肤到结石距离确定冲击波碎石术的成功率。
Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5):941-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.05.011.
5
Prediction of stone-free rates following extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in a contemporary cohort of patients with stone densities exceeding 1000 HU.预测当代一组结石密度超过 1000 HU 的患者接受体外冲击波碎石术治疗后的结石清除率。
Scand J Urol. 2020 Aug;54(4):344-348. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2020.1782981. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
6
Stone measurement by volumetric three-dimensional computed tomography for predicting the outcome after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.通过容积三维计算机断层扫描测量结石以预测体外冲击波碎石术后的结果。
BJU Int. 2009 Feb;103(4):524-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08069.x. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
7
Evaluation of computed tomography findings for success prediction after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary tract stone disease.体外冲击波碎石术治疗尿路结石疾病后,通过计算机断层扫描结果评估成功预测情况。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2015 Jan;47(1):69-73. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0857-0. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
8
Kidney stone size and hounsfield units predict successful shockwave lithotripsy in children.肾结石大小和豪斯菲尔德单位预测儿童冲击波碎石术的成功。
Urology. 2013 Apr;81(4):880-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.12.012. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
9
Comparing non contrast computerized tomography criteria versus dual X-ray absorptiometry as predictors of radio-opaque upper urinary tract stone fragmentation after electromagnetic shockwave lithotripsy.比较非对比计算机断层扫描标准与双能 X 射线吸收测定法作为电磁冲击波碎石术后不透射线上尿路结石碎裂的预测指标。
Urolithiasis. 2013 Nov;41(6):511-5. doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0596-1. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
10
The Predictive Role of Abdominal Fat Parameters and Stone Density on SWL Outcomes.腹部脂肪参数和结石密度对体外冲击波碎石术治疗效果的预测作用。
Curr Med Imaging Rev. 2020;16(1):80-87. doi: 10.2174/1573405614666180927112127.

引用本文的文献

1
Differentiation of ureteral stones and phleboliths using Hounsfield units on computerized tomography: a new method without observer bias.利用计算机断层扫描上的亨氏单位鉴别输尿管结石和静脉石:一种无观察者偏差的新方法。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Jun;45(3):323-328. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0918-1. Epub 2016 Sep 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Noncontrast computed tomography factors that predict the renal stone outcome after shock wave lithotripsy.预测冲击波碎石术后肾结石结局的非增强计算机断层扫描因素。
Clin Imaging. 2015 Sep-Oct;39(5):845-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
2
CT for evaluation of urolithiasis: image quality of ultralow-dose (Sub mSv) CT with knowledge-based iterative reconstruction and diagnostic performance of low-dose CT with statistical iterative reconstruction.用于评估尿路结石的CT:基于知识的迭代重建的超低剂量(亚毫西弗)CT的图像质量及统计迭代重建的低剂量CT的诊断性能
Abdom Imaging. 2015 Oct;40(7):2432-40. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0411-2.
3
Shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for lower pole and non-lower pole stones from a university teaching hospital: Parallel group comparison during the same time period.
某大学教学医院下极结石与非下极结石的冲击波碎石治疗结果:同一时期的平行组比较
Urol Ann. 2015 Jan-Mar;7(1):46-8. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.148601.
4
Quantification of asymptomatic kidney stone burden by computed tomography for predicting future symptomatic stone events.通过计算机断层扫描对无症状肾结石负荷进行量化以预测未来有症状的结石事件。
Urology. 2015 Jan;85(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.031. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
5
A qualitative study exploring male cancer patients' experiences with percutaneous nephrostomy.一项探索男性癌症患者经皮肾造瘘术体验的定性研究。
Scand J Urol. 2015 Apr;49(2):162-8. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2014.938694. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
6
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)或逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗肾结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 24(11):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub3.
7
Lithotripter outcomes in a community practice setting: comparison of an electromagnetic and an electrohydraulic lithotripter.社区实践环境中碎石机的治疗效果:电磁碎石机与液电碎石机的比较
J Urol. 2015 Mar;193(3):875-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.117. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
8
How do the residual fragments after SWL affect the health-related quality of life? A critical analysis in a size-based manner.体外冲击波碎石术后的残留碎片如何影响与健康相关的生活质量?基于大小的批判性分析。
Urolithiasis. 2015 Apr;43(2):163-70. doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0727-3. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
9
Measuring stone volume - three-dimensional software reconstruction or an ellipsoid algebra formula?测量结石体积——三维软件重建还是椭圆体公式?
BJU Int. 2014 Apr;113(4):610-4. doi: 10.1111/bju.12456. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
10
Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy, shock wave lithotripsy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi 10-20 mm.经皮肾镜取石术、冲击波碎石术和逆行肾内手术治疗10-20毫米下极肾结石的比较
Urol Int. 2013;91(3):345-9. doi: 10.1159/000351136. Epub 2013 Jun 28.