Stewart Katherine E, Fischer Tess M, Hirji Rehana, Davis Jane A
Can J Occup Ther. 2016 Oct;83(4):249-259. doi: 10.1177/0008417415625425. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
Foundational to the occupational therapy profession is the belief that engagement in occupation is health promoting; however, this belief fails to account for occupational engagement that may be risky or illness producing. Consensus regarding the nature of the relationship between occupation and health has yet to be achieved.
The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive description of how the relationship between occupation and health and well-being is discussed within the occupational therapy and occupational science literature.
The methodological framework outlined by Arksey and O'Malley served as the basis for this scoping review of the occupational therapy and occupational science literature.
One hundred and twelve articles were identified as meeting the criteria for inclusion. The dominant discourse portrays the relationship between occupation and health as positive.
The broader literature suggests that occupational engagement can have both positive and negative effects on health and well-being. As such, the reconceptualization of the relationship between occupation and health and well-being is warranted to enable occupational therapists to practise in a more client-centred manner.
职业治疗专业的基础理念是,参与职业活动有益健康;然而,这一理念并未考虑到可能存在风险或导致疾病的职业参与情况。关于职业与健康之间关系的本质,尚未达成共识。
本研究旨在全面描述职业治疗和职业科学文献中如何探讨职业与健康及幸福之间的关系。
阿克西和奥马利概述的方法框架为本职业治疗和职业科学文献的范围综述提供了基础。
确定有112篇文章符合纳入标准。主流论述将职业与健康之间的关系描述为积极的。
更广泛的文献表明,职业参与对健康和幸福可能产生积极和消极影响。因此,有必要重新审视职业与健康及幸福之间的关系,以使职业治疗师能够以更以客户为中心的方式开展实践。