Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, S-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Eur Heart J. 2016 Aug 7;37(30):2417-24. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw029. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
Cardiac troponin (cTn) assays with improved sensitivity are increasingly utilized for the assessment of patients admitted because of suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, data on the clinical consequences of the implementation of such assays are limited.
In a retrospective register-based study (37 710 coronary care unit admissions; SWEDEHEART registry), we compared the case mix, the use of diagnostic procedures, treatments, and 1-year all-cause mortality 1 year before the implementation of a cTn assay with improved sensitivity (study period 1) and 1 year thereafter (study period 2). During study period 2, more at-risk patients were admitted and more patients had cTn levels above the myocardial infarction cut-off (ACS patients +13.1%; non-ACS patients +160.1%). cTn levels above this cut-off exhibited stronger associations with mortality risk in study period 2 (adjusted HR 4.45 [95% confidence interval, CI, 3.36-5.89]) compared with period 1 (adjusted HR 2.43 [95% CI 2.11-2.80]), similar as for the cTn ratio relative to the respective 99th percentile. While there was no multivariable-adjusted increase in the use of diagnostic procedures, significant trends towards more differentiated treatment depending on the cause of cTn elevation, i.e. ACS or non-ACS, were noted.
The implementation of a cTn assay with improved sensitivity was associated with an increase in the number of patients who due to their cTn-status were identified as suitable for beneficial therapies. There was no inappropriate increase in hospital resource utilization. As such, cTn assays with improved sensitivity provide an opportunity to improve the clinical management of patients with suspected ACS.
心肌肌钙蛋白(cTn)检测的灵敏度不断提高,目前已广泛用于疑似急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的评估。然而,目前有关此类检测应用后临床结果的数据较为有限。
在一项回顾性基于注册的研究(37710 例冠心病监护病房入院患者;SWEDEHEART 注册研究)中,我们比较了在灵敏度提高的 cTn 检测实施前 1 年(研究期 1)和之后 1 年(研究期 2)的患者构成比、诊断程序的应用、治疗方法和 1 年全因死亡率。在研究期 2,更多高危患者入院,且更多患者的 cTn 水平超过心肌梗死截断值(ACS 患者增加 13.1%;非 ACS 患者增加 160.1%)。与研究期 1相比(校正后 HR 2.43[95%CI 2.11-2.80]),研究期 2 cTn 水平超过截断值与死亡率风险的相关性更强(校正后 HR 4.45[95%CI 3.36-5.89]),而 cTn 与各自第 99 百分位比值的相关性也类似。虽然多变量校正后诊断程序的应用并未增加,但根据 cTn 升高的原因(ACS 或非 ACS),治疗方法的差异程度显著增加。
灵敏度提高的 cTn 检测的应用与因 cTn 状态而被认为适合接受有益治疗的患者数量增加有关。医院资源利用并未出现不适当增加。因此,提高灵敏度的 cTn 检测为改善疑似 ACS 患者的临床管理提供了机会。