• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

11家制药公司对常用在线药品信息汇编中的错误信息进行的联合评估。

A Collaborative Assessment Among 11 Pharmaceutical Companies of Misinformation in Commonly Used Online Drug Information Compendia.

作者信息

Randhawa Amarita S, Babalola Olakiitan, Henney Zachary, Miller Michele, Nelson Tanya, Oza Meerat, Patel Chandni, Randhawa Anupma S, Riley Joyce, Snyder Scott, So Sherri

机构信息

Purdue Pharma LP, Stamford, CT, USA

Celgene Corporation, Berkeley Heights, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 2016 May;50(5):352-9. doi: 10.1177/1060028016635196. Epub 2016 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1177/1060028016635196
PMID:26917822
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4871169/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Online drug information compendia (ODIC) are valuable tools that health care professionals (HCPs) and consumers use to educate themselves on pharmaceutical products. Research suggests that these resources, although informative and easily accessible, may contain misinformation, posing risk for product misuse and patient harm.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate drug summaries within ODIC for accuracy and completeness and identify product-specific misinformation.

METHODS

Between August 2014 and January 2015, medical information (MI) specialists from 11 pharmaceutical/biotechnology companies systematically evaluated 270 drug summaries within 5 commonly used ODIC for misinformation. Using a standardized approach, errors were identified; classified as inaccurate, incomplete, or omitted; and categorized per sections of the Full Prescribing Information (FPI). On review of each drug summary, content-correction requests were proposed and supported by the respective product's FPI.

RESULTS

Across the 270 drug summaries reviewed within the 5 compendia, the median of the total number of errors identified was 782, with the greatest number of errors occurring in the categories of Dosage and Administration, Patient Education, and Warnings and Precautions. The majority of errors were classified as incomplete, followed by inaccurate and omitted.

CONCLUSION

This analysis demonstrates that ODIC may contain misinformation. HCPs and consumers should be aware of the potential for misinformation and consider more than 1 drug information resource, including the FPI and Medication Guide as well as pharmaceutical/biotechnology companies' MI departments, to obtain unbiased, accurate, and complete product-specific drug information to help support the safe and effective use of prescription drug products.

摘要

背景

在线药品信息汇编(ODIC)是医疗保健专业人员(HCP)和消费者用于自我了解药品的宝贵工具。研究表明,这些资源虽然信息丰富且易于获取,但可能包含错误信息,存在产品误用和患者伤害的风险。

目的

评估ODIC中的药品概述的准确性和完整性,并识别特定产品的错误信息。

方法

在2014年8月至2015年1月期间,来自11家制药/生物技术公司的医学信息(MI)专家系统地评估了5种常用ODIC中的270份药品概述是否存在错误信息。采用标准化方法识别错误;将其分类为不准确、不完整或遗漏;并按完整处方信息(FPI)的各部分进行分类。在审查每份药品概述时,根据相应产品的FPI提出并支持内容更正请求。

结果

在这5个汇编中审查的270份药品概述中,识别出的错误总数中位数为782,其中错误数量最多的类别是用法用量、患者教育以及警告和注意事项。大多数错误被分类为不完整,其次是不准确和遗漏。

结论

该分析表明ODIC可能包含错误信息。HCP和消费者应意识到存在错误信息的可能性,并考虑使用多种药品信息资源,包括FPI和用药指南以及制药/生物技术公司的MI部门,以获取公正、准确和完整的特定产品药品信息,以帮助支持处方药产品的安全有效使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ee/4871169/b8b851cb9c50/10.1177_1060028016635196-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ee/4871169/cc0447abd6ed/10.1177_1060028016635196-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ee/4871169/533242964db7/10.1177_1060028016635196-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ee/4871169/b8b851cb9c50/10.1177_1060028016635196-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ee/4871169/cc0447abd6ed/10.1177_1060028016635196-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ee/4871169/533242964db7/10.1177_1060028016635196-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ee/4871169/b8b851cb9c50/10.1177_1060028016635196-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
A Collaborative Assessment Among 11 Pharmaceutical Companies of Misinformation in Commonly Used Online Drug Information Compendia.11家制药公司对常用在线药品信息汇编中的错误信息进行的联合评估。
Ann Pharmacother. 2016 May;50(5):352-9. doi: 10.1177/1060028016635196. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
2
Caveat emptor: Erroneous safety information about opioids in online drug-information compendia.买家需谨慎:在线药品信息汇编中关于阿片类药物的错误安全信息。
J Opioid Manag. 2016 Jul-Aug;12(4):281-8. doi: 10.5055/jom.2016.0343.
3
Implementing a Process to Review Product-Specific Misinformation in Online Drug Information Compendia.实施一个流程以审查在线药品信息汇编中特定产品的错误信息。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2015 Mar;49(2):262-268. doi: 10.1177/2168479014558274.
4
Pharmaceutical companies and their drugs on social media: a content analysis of drug information on popular social media sites.制药公司及其药品在社交媒体上的情况:对热门社交媒体网站上药品信息的内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 1;17(6):e130. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4357.
5
A comparison of drug product information in four national compendia.四个国家药典中药品信息的比较。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1983 Mar;33(3):269-77. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1983.32.
6
[Early achievements of the Danish pharmaceutical industry--8. Lundbeck].[丹麦制药行业的早期成就——8. 灵北公司]
Theriaca. 2016(43):9-61.
7
Vulnerabilities to misinformation in online pharmaceutical marketing.网络药品营销中的错误信息漏洞。
J R Soc Med. 2013 May;106(5):184-9. doi: 10.1177/0141076813476679.
8
Trouble Spots in Online Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Promotion: A Content Analysis of FDA Warning Letters.在线直接面向消费者的处方药促销中的问题点:FDA 警告信的内容分析。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Aug 25;4(12):813-21. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.157.
9
Correction of misleading information in prescription drug television advertising: The roles of advertisement similarity and time delay.修正处方药电视广告中的误导性信息:广告相似度和时间延迟的作用。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Mar-Apr;13(2):378-388. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
10
Availability and quality of illegitimate somatropin products obtained from the Internet.互联网非法获得的生长激素产品的供应和质量。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2017 Feb;39(1):78-87. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0398-y. Epub 2016 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferences for Accessing Medical Information in the Digital Age: Health Care Professional Survey.数字时代获取医疗信息的偏好:医疗保健专业人员调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 19;23(6):e25868. doi: 10.2196/25868.
2
Evaluation of medication dose adjustments in patients with impaired renal function using different online drug information databases.评估不同在线药物信息数据库中肾功能损害患者的药物剂量调整。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2022 Sep;29(5):255-258. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002395. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
3
The Gap in Electronic Drug Information Resources: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing a Process to Review Product-Specific Misinformation in Online Drug Information Compendia.实施一个流程以审查在线药品信息汇编中特定产品的错误信息。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2015 Mar;49(2):262-268. doi: 10.1177/2168479014558274.
2
Pharmacists' use of electronic handheld drug information applications.药剂师对电子手持式药品信息应用程序的使用。
Ann Pharmacother. 2014 Oct;48(10):1392-3. doi: 10.1177/1060028014542269.
3
An evaluation of pharmacogenomic information provided by five common drug information resources.五种常见药物信息资源提供的药物基因组学信息评估。
电子药品信息资源的差距:一项系统综述
Cureus. 2018 Jun 22;10(6):e2860. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2860.
4
Response to Lapkoff and Sittig. Who Watches the Watchers: Working Towards Safety for Clinical Decision Support Knowledge Resources.对拉普科夫和西蒂格的回应。谁来监管监管者:努力实现临床决策支持知识资源的安全。
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Dec 20;8(3):945-948. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2017050081.
5
Who Watches the Watchers. Working Towards Safety for EHR Knowledge Resources.谁来监管监管者。致力于电子健康记录知识资源的安全。
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Jun 28;8(2):680-685. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2017-02-IE-0032.
6
Online information seeking by patients with bipolar disorder: results from an international multisite survey.双相障碍患者的在线信息寻求:一项国际多中心调查的结果。
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2016 Dec;4(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40345-016-0058-0. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2014 Jan;102(1):47-51. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.102.1.009.
4
Mobile devices in medicine: a survey of how medical students, residents, and faculty use smartphones and other mobile devices to find information.移动设备在医学中的应用:对医学生、住院医师和教师如何使用智能手机和其他移动设备来获取信息的调查。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2014 Jan;102(1):22-30. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.102.1.006.
5
Electronic pharmacopoeia: a missed opportunity for safe opioid prescribing information?电子药典:获取安全阿片类药物处方信息的错失良机?
J Med Toxicol. 2014 Mar;10(1):15-8. doi: 10.1007/s13181-013-0351-6.
6
Medical applications for pharmacists using mobile devices.移动设备在药师医疗应用中的作用
Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Jul-Aug;47(7-8):1088-95. doi: 10.1345/aph.1S035. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
7
Utility of the electronic information resource UpToDate for clinical decision-making at bedside rounds.电子信息资源 UpToDate 在床边查房时进行临床决策的效用。
Singapore Med J. 2012 Feb;53(2):116-20.
8
Use of UpToDate and outcomes in US hospitals.使用 UpToDate 与美国医院的结局。
J Hosp Med. 2012 Feb;7(2):85-90. doi: 10.1002/jhm.944. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
9
Boxed warning inconsistencies between drug information resources and the prescribing information.药品信息资源与处方信息之间的盒装警告不一致。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2011 Sep 1;68(17):1626-31. doi: 10.2146/ajhp110025.
10
The sources and popularity of online drug information: an analysis of top search engine results and web page views.在线药物信息的来源和流行度:对顶级搜索引擎结果和网页浏览量的分析。
Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Mar;45(3):350-6. doi: 10.1345/aph.1P572. Epub 2011 Feb 22.