Opdam Njm, Frankenberger R, Magne P
Oper Dent. 2016 Sep;41(S7):S27-S34. doi: 10.2341/15-126-LIT. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
Traditionally, indirect restorations are expected to have better longevity than direct restorations. The introduction of adhesive dentistry and the minimally invasive approach of restorative treatment has changed this. In this article, the differences in longevity between direct and indirect restorations in the posterior dentition are explained. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of direct and indirect restorations placed in a minimally invasive way and using a proper adhesive technique are described.
传统上,人们认为间接修复体的使用寿命比直接修复体更长。粘结牙科的引入以及修复治疗的微创方法改变了这一状况。本文解释了后牙列中直接修复体和间接修复体在使用寿命上的差异。此外,还描述了以微创方式并采用适当粘结技术放置直接修复体和间接修复体的优缺点。