• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

气化灰渣的快速毒性筛查。

Rapid toxicity screening of gasification ashes.

机构信息

NUS Environmental Research Institute, National University of Singapore, 1 Create Way, Create Tower #15-02, Singapore 138602, Singapore; Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, 4 Engineering Drive 4, Singapore 117585, Singapore.

Department of Anatomy, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 4 Medical Drive, Singapore 117597, Singapore.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2016 Apr;50:93-104. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.016. Epub 2016 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.016
PMID:26923299
Abstract

The solid residues including bottom ashes and fly ashes produced by waste gasification technology could be reused as secondary raw materials. However, the applications and utilizations of these ashes are very often restricted by their toxicity. Therefore, toxicity screening of ash is the primary condition for reusing the ash. In this manuscript, we establish a standard for rapid screening of gasification ashes on the basis of in vitro and in vivo testing, and henceforth guide the proper disposal of the ashes. We used three different test models comprising human cell lines (liver and lung cells), Drosophila melanogaster and Daphnia magna to examine the toxicity of six different types of ashes. For each ash, different leachate concentrations were used to examine the toxicity, with C0 being the original extracted leachate concentration, while C/C0 being subsequent diluted concentrations. The IC50 for each leachate was also quantified for use as an index to classify toxicity levels. The results demonstrated that the toxicity evaluation of different types of ashes using different models is consistent with each other. As the different models show consistent qualitative results, we chose one or two of the models (liver cells or lung cells models) as the standard for rapid toxicity screening of gasification ashes. We may classify the gasification ashes into three categories according to the IC50, 24h value on liver cells or lung cells models, namely "toxic level I" (IC50, 24h>C/C0=0.5), "toxic level II" (C/C0=0.05<IC50, 24h<C/C0=0.5) and "toxic level III" (IC50, 24h<C/C0=0.05). Such a simple yet informative approach can help to determine the toxic effects of various types of ashes generated in gasification plants every day. Subsequently, appropriate disposal methods can be recommended for each toxicity category.

摘要

废气化技术产生的固体残余物(包括底灰和飞灰)可以作为二次原料再利用。然而,这些灰分的应用和利用通常受到其毒性的限制。因此,灰分的毒性筛选是再利用灰分的首要条件。在本文中,我们建立了基于体外和体内测试的气化灰分快速筛选标准,并据此指导灰分的适当处理。我们使用包括人类细胞系(肝和肺细胞)、黑腹果蝇和大型溞在内的三种不同的测试模型来检查六种不同类型的灰分的毒性。对于每种灰分,我们使用不同的浸出液浓度来检查毒性,其中 C0 是原始提取的浸出液浓度,而 C/C0 是后续稀释的浓度。还量化了每种浸出液的 IC50,用作分类毒性水平的指标。结果表明,使用不同模型对不同类型灰分的毒性评估彼此一致。由于不同的模型显示出一致的定性结果,我们选择了一个或两个模型(肝或肺细胞模型)作为气化灰分快速毒性筛选的标准。我们可以根据 IC50 值、肝或肺细胞模型的 24 小时值将气化灰分分为三类,即“毒性水平 I”(IC50 值,24 小时值>C/C0=0.5)、“毒性水平 II”(C/C0=0.05<IC50 值,24 小时值<C/C0=0.5)和“毒性水平 III”(IC50 值,24 小时值<C/C0=0.05)。这种简单而有信息量的方法可以帮助确定气化厂每天产生的各种类型灰分的毒性影响。随后,可以为每个毒性类别推荐适当的处理方法。

相似文献

1
Rapid toxicity screening of gasification ashes.气化灰渣的快速毒性筛查。
Waste Manag. 2016 Apr;50:93-104. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.016. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
2
Toxicity of waste gasification bottom ash leachate.废气气化底灰浸出液的毒性。
Waste Manag. 2012 Jun;32(6):1171-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
3
Co-gasification of sewage sludge and woody biomass in a fixed-bed downdraft gasifier: toxicity assessment of solid residues.固定床下吸式气化炉中污水污泥与木质生物质的共气化:固体残渣的毒性评估。
Waste Manag. 2015 Feb;36:241-55. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.11.026. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
4
Assessment of mobility and bioavailability of contaminants in MSW incineration ash with aquatic and terrestrial bioassays.采用水生和陆生生物测定法评估垃圾焚烧灰中污染物的迁移性和生物可利用性。
Waste Manag. 2014 Oct;34(10):1871-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.12.024. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
5
Basic characteristics of leachate produced by various washing processes for MSWI ashes in Taiwan.台湾地区各种 MSWI 灰分洗涤过程产生的渗滤液的基本特征。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Aug 15;104:67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.008. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
6
Physical and chemical characterization of ashes from a municipal solid waste incinerator in China.中国城市生活垃圾焚烧厂灰分的物理化学特性。
Waste Manag Res. 2013 Jul;31(7):663-73. doi: 10.1177/0734242X13485793. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
7
Evaluation of interactions between soil and coal fly ash leachates using column percolation tests.使用柱渗透试验评估土壤与粉煤灰渗滤液之间的相互作用。
Waste Manag. 2015 Sep;43:255-63. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.05.031. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
8
Co-gasification of municipal solid waste and material recovery in a large-scale gasification and melting system.在大型气化熔融系统中进行城市固体废物与物质回收的共气化。
Waste Manag. 2012 Apr;32(4):667-75. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.10.019. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
9
Co-combustion of coal and sewage sludge: chemical and ecotoxicological properties of ashes.煤与污水污泥的共燃烧:灰分的化学和生态毒理学特性
J Hazard Mater. 2009 Oct 30;170(2-3):902-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.053. Epub 2009 May 19.
10
LCA of management strategies for RDF incineration and gasification bottom ash based on experimental leaching data.基于实验浸出数据的 RDF 焚烧和气化底灰管理策略的生命周期评价。
Waste Manag. 2016 Jan;47(Pt B):285-98. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.05.032. Epub 2015 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the potential of coal fly ash produced by gasification as hexavalent chromium adsorbent.评估气化产生的粉煤灰作为六价铬吸附剂的潜力。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Oct;26(28):28603-28613. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3852-7. Epub 2018 Dec 13.