Richards Jeremy B, Strout Tania D, Seigel Todd A, Wilcox Susan R
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Tufts University School of Medicine and Department of Emergency Medicine, Maine Medical Center; Portland, ME, USA.
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016 Feb 16;13:10. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.10. eCollection 2016.
Prior descriptions of the psychometric properties of validated knowledge assessment tools designed to determine Emergency medicine (EM) residents understanding of physiologic and clinical concepts related to mechanical ventilation are lacking. In this setting, we have performed this study to describe the psychometric and performance properties of a novel knowledge assessment tool that measures EM residents' knowledge of topics in mechanical ventilation.
Results from a multicenter, prospective, survey study involving 219 EM residents from 8 academic hospitals in northeastern United States were analyzed to quantify reliability, item difficulty, and item discrimination of each of the 9 questions included in the knowledge assessment tool for 3 weeks, beginning in January 2013.
The response rate for residents completing the knowledge assessment tool was 68.6% (214 out of 312 EM residents). Reliability was assessed by both Cronbach's alpha coefficient (0.6293) and the Spearman-Brown coefficient (0.6437). Item difficulty ranged from 0.39 to 0.96, with a mean item difficulty of 0.75 for all 9 questions. Uncorrected item discrimination values ranged from 0.111 to 0.556. Corrected item-total correlations were determined by removing the question being assessed from analysis, resulting in a range of item discrimination from 0.139 to 0.498.
Reliability, item difficulty and item discrimination were within satisfactory ranges in this study, demonstrating acceptable psychometric properties of this knowledge assessment tool. This assessment indicates that this knowledge assessment tool is sufficiently rigorous for use in future research studies or for assessment of EM residents for evaluative purposes.
目前缺乏对旨在确定急诊医学(EM)住院医师对与机械通气相关的生理和临床概念理解的有效知识评估工具的心理测量特性的先前描述。在此背景下,我们开展了本研究,以描述一种测量EM住院医师机械通气主题知识的新型知识评估工具的心理测量和性能特性。
对一项多中心、前瞻性调查研究的结果进行分析,该研究涉及美国东北部8家学术医院的219名EM住院医师,从2013年1月开始,为期3周,以量化知识评估工具中9个问题各自的信度、项目难度和项目区分度。
完成知识评估工具的住院医师的回复率为68.6%(312名EM住院医师中的214名)。通过克朗巴哈α系数(0.6293)和斯皮尔曼-布朗系数(0.6437)评估信度。项目难度范围为0.39至0.96,所有9个问题的平均项目难度为0.75。未校正的项目区分度值范围为0.111至0.556。通过从分析中移除正在评估的问题来确定校正后的项目-总分相关性,项目区分度范围为0.139至0.498。
本研究中信度、项目难度和项目区分度均在可接受范围内,表明该知识评估工具具有可接受的心理测量特性。该评估表明,这种知识评估工具足够严格,可用于未来的研究或用于评估EM住院医师以进行评估目的。