Merisaari Harri, Movahedi Parisa, Perez Ileana M, Toivonen Jussi, Pesola Marko, Taimen Pekka, Boström Peter J, Pahikkala Tapio, Kiviniemi Aida, Aronen Hannu J, Jambor Ivan
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Turku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Mar;77(3):1249-1264. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26169. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
To evaluate different fitting methods for intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging of prostate cancer in the terms of repeatability and Gleason score prediction.
Eighty-one patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer underwent two repeated 3 Tesla diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) examinations performed using 14 b-values in the range of 0-500 s/mm and diffusion time of 19.004 ms. Mean signal intensities of regions-of-interest were fitted using five different fitting methods for IVIM as well as monoexponential, kurtosis, and stretched exponential models. The fitting methods and models were evaluated in the terms of fitting quality [Akaike information criteria (AIC)], repeatability, and Gleason score prediction. Tumors were classified into three groups (3 + 3, 3 + 4, > 3 + 4). Machine learning algorithms were used to evaluate the performance of the combined use of the parameters. Simulation studies were performed to evaluate robustness of the fitting methods against noise.
Monoexponential model was preferred over IVIM based on AIC. The "pseudodiffusion" parameters demonstrated low repeatability and clinical value. Median "pseudodiffusion" fraction values were below 8.00%. Combined use of the parameters did not outperform the monoexponential model.
Monoexponential model demonstrated the highest repeatability and clinical values in the regions-of-interest based analysis of prostate cancer DWI, b-values in the range of 0-500 s/mm . Magn Reson Med 77:1249-1264, 2017. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
从可重复性和Gleason评分预测方面评估前列腺癌体素内不相干运动(IVIM)成像的不同拟合方法。
81例经组织学证实的前列腺癌患者接受了两次重复的3特斯拉扩散加权成像(DWI)检查,使用14个b值(范围为0 - 500 s/mm²)以及19.004 ms的扩散时间。使用五种不同的IVIM拟合方法以及单指数、峰度和拉伸指数模型对感兴趣区域的平均信号强度进行拟合。从拟合质量[赤池信息准则(AIC)]、可重复性和Gleason评分预测方面评估拟合方法和模型。肿瘤分为三组(3 + 3、3 + 4、> 3 + 4)。使用机器学习算法评估参数联合使用的性能。进行模拟研究以评估拟合方法对噪声的鲁棒性。
基于AIC,单指数模型优于IVIM。“假扩散”参数显示出低可重复性和临床价值。“假扩散”分数值中位数低于8.00%。参数联合使用并不优于单指数模型。
在前列腺癌DWI感兴趣区域分析中,单指数模型在0 - 500 s/mm²范围内的b值下表现出最高的可重复性和临床价值。Magn Reson Med 77:1249 - 1264, 2017. © 2016国际磁共振医学学会。