• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性颈动脉夹层的管理:单中心的初步经验

Management of traumatic carotid artery dissection: initial experience of a single center.

作者信息

Zhengxing Xie, Zhenwen Cui, Yuhao Sun, Zhihong Zhong, Liuguan Bian, Qingfang Sun

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197, Rui Jin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, China.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2016 Jul;39(3):393-9. doi: 10.1007/s10143-015-0689-0. Epub 2016 Feb 29.

DOI:10.1007/s10143-015-0689-0
PMID:26924802
Abstract

Traumatic carotid artery dissection (tCAD) bears the risk of hypoperfusion inducing delayed cerebral ischemia. The lack of consensus on standard treatment of tCAD remains a great challenge. Here, we present our successes on a series of patients with delayed tCAD diagnosis and treatment using multimodality treatment strategies. We retrospectively reviewed 21 patients with tCAD treated with carotid artery stent placement or anticoagulation therapy. There were 14 dissection locations (66.67 %) which involved extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) and seven locations (33.33 %) which involved both extracranial and intracranial ICA. Stenosis severity was 70-99 % in 16 cases (76.19 %) and <70 % in 5 cases (23.81 %). Endovascular stents were administrated to 17 patients with hypoperfusion as evaluated by radiological methods, while anticoagulation therapy was administrated to the other four patients. Carotid revascularization was performed with one (9/17 patients) or multiple (8/17 patients) stents. None of the patients experienced a procedure-related complication. At discharge, the mean modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of patients was 1.08 ± 0.76. Neither additional neurological deficient nor restenosis happened during the follow-up period. More vigilance is required to assure timely diagnosis of patients with delayed tCAD. Assessment of cerebral perfusion is an effective approach in tCAD treatment in our experience.

摘要

创伤性颈动脉夹层(tCAD)存在低灌注诱发迟发性脑缺血的风险。对于tCAD的标准治疗缺乏共识仍然是一个巨大的挑战。在此,我们展示了我们在一系列采用多模式治疗策略对tCAD进行延迟诊断和治疗的患者中的成功经验。我们回顾性分析了21例接受颈动脉支架置入或抗凝治疗的tCAD患者。其中14个夹层部位(66.67%)累及颅外颈内动脉(ICA),7个部位(33.33%)累及颅外和颅内ICA。16例(76.19%)狭窄严重程度为70% - 99%,5例(23.81%)狭窄严重程度<70%。通过影像学方法评估,17例存在低灌注的患者接受了血管内支架治疗,另外4例患者接受了抗凝治疗。17例患者中,9例置入1枚支架,8例置入多枚支架进行颈动脉血运重建。所有患者均未发生与手术相关的并发症。出院时,患者的平均改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分为1.08±0.76。随访期间未出现额外的神经功能缺损或再狭窄。对于延迟性tCAD患者,需要更加警惕以确保及时诊断。根据我们的经验,评估脑灌注是tCAD治疗的一种有效方法。

相似文献

1
Management of traumatic carotid artery dissection: initial experience of a single center.创伤性颈动脉夹层的管理:单中心的初步经验
Neurosurg Rev. 2016 Jul;39(3):393-9. doi: 10.1007/s10143-015-0689-0. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
2
Emergent extracranial internal carotid artery stenting and mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中的急诊颅外颈内动脉支架置入术和机械取栓术
Interv Neuroradiol. 2015 Apr;21(2):205-14. doi: 10.1177/1591019915583213. Epub 2015 May 5.
3
Emergent stent-assisted angioplasty of extracranial internal carotid artery and intracranial stent-based thrombectomy in acute tandem occlusive disease: technical considerations.紧急颅外颈内动脉支架辅助血管成形术和急性串联闭塞病变中基于支架的颅内血栓切除术:技术考虑。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2013 Sep 1;5(5):440-6. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010340. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
4
Endovascular stent therapy for extracranial and intracranial carotid artery dissection: single-center experience.血管内支架治疗颅外和颅内颈动脉夹层:单中心经验。
J Neurosurg. 2011 Jul;115(1):91-100. doi: 10.3171/2011.1.JNS091806. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
5
Management of acute ischemic stroke due to tandem occlusion: should endovascular recanalization of the extracranial or intracranial occlusive lesion be done first?串联闭塞所致急性缺血性卒中的管理:颅外或颅内闭塞病变的血管内再通应先进行哪一个?
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Apr;42(4):E16. doi: 10.3171/2017.1.FOCUS16500.
6
Flow-diverter Stents for Internal Carotid Artery Reconstruction Following Spontaneous Dissection: A Technical Report.血流导向装置在颈内动脉自发性夹层后的重建中的应用:一项技术报告。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2019 Dec;29(4):707-715. doi: 10.1007/s00062-018-0707-z. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
7
Carotid artery stenting in acute stroke.颈动脉支架置入术治疗急性脑卒中。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Nov 29;58(23):2363-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.044.
8
Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery Dissection Treated with Self-expandable Stents: A Single-Centre Experience.自膨式支架治疗颅外颈内动脉夹层:单中心经验
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015 Dec;38(6):1451-7. doi: 10.1007/s00270-015-1101-8. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
9
Diagnostic and therapeutic alternatives in patients with symptomatic "carotid occlusion" referred for extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery.
J Neurosurg. 1981 Jun;54(6):790-6. doi: 10.3171/jns.1981.54.6.0790.
10
Tandem middle cerebral artery-internal carotid artery occlusions: reduced occlusion-to-revascularization time using a trans-anterior communicating artery approach with a penumbra device.串联大脑中动脉-颈内动脉闭塞:使用经前交通动脉入路联合缺血半暗带保护装置可缩短闭塞至再通时间。
J Neurosurg. 2012 Mar;116(3):665-71. doi: 10.3171/2011.10.JNS111516. Epub 2011 Dec 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Stent-Assisted Angioplasty in Spontaneous Bilateral Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery Dissection.支架辅助血管成形术治疗自发性双侧颅外颈内动脉夹层
Front Neurol. 2020 Nov 13;11:582253. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.582253. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Endovascular repair of traumatic cervical internal carotid artery injuries: a safe and effective treatment option.血管内修复外伤性颈内动脉损伤:一种安全有效的治疗选择。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Jun-Jul;34(6):1219-26. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3337. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
2
Symptomatic recurrence of intracranial arterial dissections: follow-up study of 143 consecutive cases and pathological investigation.颅内动脉夹层的症状性复发:143 例连续病例的随访研究和病理研究。
Stroke. 2013 Jan;44(1):126-31. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.670745. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
3
Single-center experience on endovascular reconstruction of traumatic internal carotid artery dissections.
创伤性颈内动脉夹层血管内重建的单中心经验。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jan;72(1):216-21. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823f630a.
4
Carotid artery dissection: three cases and a review of the literature.颈动脉夹层:三例病例并文献复习。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;19(3):181-7. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328349ee6d.
5
Endovascular stent therapy for extracranial and intracranial carotid artery dissection: single-center experience.血管内支架治疗颅外和颅内颈动脉夹层:单中心经验。
J Neurosurg. 2011 Jul;115(1):91-100. doi: 10.3171/2011.1.JNS091806. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
6
Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association.《卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作患者卒中预防指南:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会医疗保健专业人员指南》。
Stroke. 2011 Jan;42(1):227-76. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3181f7d043. Epub 2010 Oct 21.
7
A multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for blunt cerebrovascular injury.多变量逻辑回归分析钝性脑血管损伤的危险因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Jan;51(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.071. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
8
Cervical-artery dissections: predisposing factors, diagnosis, and outcome.颈动脉夹层:诱发因素、诊断及预后
Lancet Neurol. 2009 Jul;8(7):668-78. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70084-5.
9
Periprocedural drug therapy in carotid artery stenting: the need for more evidence.
Vascular. 2008 Nov-Dec;16(6):303-9. doi: 10.2310/6670.2008.00081.
10
Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: does treatment always matter?钝性脑血管损伤:治疗是否总是至关重要?
J Trauma. 2009 Jan;66(1):132-43; discussion 143-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318142d146.