Bellamy Richard, Weale Albert
J Eur Public Policy. 2015 Feb 7;22(2):257-274. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.995118. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
The crisis of the euro area has severely tested the political authority of the European Union (EU). The crisis raises questions of normative legitimacy both because the EU is a normative order and because the construction of economic and monetary union (EMU) rested upon a theory that stressed the normative value of the depoliticization of money. However, this theory neglected the normative logic of the two-level game implicit in EMU. It also neglected the need for an impartial and publically acceptable constitutional order to acknowledge reasonable disagreements. By contrast, we contend that any reconstruction of the EU's economic constitution has to pay attention to reconciling a European monetary order with the legitimacy of member state governance. The EU requires a two-level contract to meet this standard. Member states must treat each other as equals and be representative of and accountable to their citizens on an equitable basis. These criteria entail that the EU's political legitimacy requires a form of cracy that we call 'republican intergovernmentalism'. Only rules that could be acceptable as the product of a political constitution among the peoples of Europe can ultimately meet the required standards of political legitimacy. Such a political constitution could be brought about through empowering national parliaments in EU decision-making.
欧元区危机对欧盟(EU)的政治权威进行了严峻考验。这场危机引发了规范性合法性问题,这既是因为欧盟是一个规范性秩序,也是因为经济与货币联盟(EMU)的构建基于一种强调货币去政治化的规范性价值的理论。然而,该理论忽视了经济与货币联盟中隐含的两级博弈的规范性逻辑。它还忽视了需要一个公正且为公众所接受的宪法秩序来承认合理分歧。相比之下,我们认为,欧盟经济宪法的任何重建都必须注重协调欧洲货币秩序与成员国治理的合法性。欧盟需要一份两级契约来达到这一标准。成员国必须平等相待,并在公平的基础上代表其公民并对其负责。这些标准意味着欧盟的政治合法性需要一种我们称之为“共和式政府间主义”的统治形式。只有那些能够作为欧洲各国人民之间政治宪法的产物而被接受的规则,才能最终达到政治合法性所需的标准。这样一部政治宪法可以通过在欧盟决策过程中赋予各国议会权力来实现。