• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧盟为何以及应如何捍卫其价值观?

Why and How Should the European Union Defend its Values?

作者信息

Olsen Tore Vincents

机构信息

Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 7, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.

出版信息

Res Publica. 2023;29(1):69-88. doi: 10.1007/s11158-022-09560-5. Epub 2022 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1007/s11158-022-09560-5
PMID:36034088
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9390962/
Abstract

This article provides a normative framework for evaluating the moral permissibility of various defences of European Union (EU) values against their violation in EU member states. This requires, first, a coherent interpretation of EU values as the values of liberal democracy; second, a clear notion of when they are violated; third, a theory of how liberal democracy can be defended with measures that are consistent with the values of liberal democracy themselves; and, finally, a discussion of what the EU's role is in this defence. The article argues that it would be permissible for the EU to combine a number of political, cultural, socio-economic and legal responses in a concentric defence of liberal democracy as long as they respect the separation of powers doctrine and do not rely on problematic notions of collective responsibility.

摘要

本文提供了一个规范性框架,用于评估在欧盟成员国中针对欧盟价值观遭受侵犯而采取的各种捍卫措施在道德上的可允许性。这首先需要对欧盟价值观进行连贯的解释,将其视为自由民主的价值观;其次,要明确它们何时受到侵犯;第三,要有一种理论,说明如何通过与自由民主自身价值观相一致的措施来捍卫自由民主;最后,要讨论欧盟在这种捍卫中所扮演的角色。本文认为,只要尊重权力分立原则且不依赖有问题的集体责任观念,欧盟在对自由民主进行同心捍卫时,将多种政治、文化、社会经济和法律应对措施结合起来是可允许的。

相似文献

1
Why and How Should the European Union Defend its Values?欧盟为何以及应如何捍卫其价值观?
Res Publica. 2023;29(1):69-88. doi: 10.1007/s11158-022-09560-5. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
2
A clash of civilizations? Examining liberal-democratic values in Turkey and the European Union.文明冲突?审视土耳其与欧盟的自由民主价值观。
Br J Sociol. 2008 Dec;59(4):681-708. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.00215.x.
3
The Need for an EU Expulsion Mechanism: Democratic Backsliding and the Failure of Article 7.欧盟驱逐机制的必要性:民主倒退与第7条的失效
Res Publica. 2022;28(4):693-713. doi: 10.1007/s11158-021-09537-w. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
4
Political legitimacy and European monetary union: contracts, constitutionalism and the normative logic of two-level games.政治合法性与欧洲货币联盟:契约、宪政主义与双层博弈的规范逻辑
J Eur Public Policy. 2015 Feb 7;22(2):257-274. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.995118. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
5
National gambling policies and the containment of the EU's politico-legal influence.国家赌博政策与欧盟政治法律影响力的遏制
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2019 Apr;36(2):77-90. doi: 10.1177/1455072519835703. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
6
Analysing the EU's collective securitisation moves towards China.分析欧盟针对中国的集体证券化举措。
Asia Eur J. 2022;20(2):195-216. doi: 10.1007/s10308-021-00640-4. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
7
Value Alignment and Public Perceived Legitimacy of the European Union and the Court of Justice.欧盟与欧洲法院的价值一致性及公众认知的合法性
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 3;12:785892. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.785892. eCollection 2021.
8
The role of the European Union in global health: The EU's self-perception(s) within the COVID-19 pandemic.欧盟在全球卫生中的作用:欧盟在新冠疫情中的自我认知
Health Policy. 2023 Jan;127:5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
9
Towards a Socialization of the EU's New Economic Governance Regime? EU Labour Policy Interventions in Germany, Ireland, Italy and Romania (2009-2019).欧盟新经济治理体系的社会化之路?欧盟对德国、爱尔兰、意大利和罗马尼亚的劳工政策干预(2009 - 2019年)
Br J Ind Relat. 2021 Mar;59(1):191-213. doi: 10.1111/bjir.12522. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
10
Advertising of medical devices: foreign experience and Ukrainian practice.医疗器械广告:国外经验与乌克兰实践
Wiad Lek. 2017;70(3 pt 1):456-461.