Carstairs Greg L, Ham Daniel J, Savage Robert J, Best Stuart A, Beck Benjamin, Doyle Timothy L A
Land Division, Defence Science and Technology Organisation, 506 Lorimer Street, Fishermans Bend, VIC 3207, Australia.
Mil Med. 2016 Mar;181(3):258-64. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00070.
Soldiers undergo regular physical testing to assess their functional capacity. However, current physical tests, such as push-ups, sit-ups, and pull-ups, do not necessarily assess job-specific physical capability. This article assesses the utility of generic predictive tests and a task-related predictive test in predicting performance against four job-critical military manual handling tasks. The box lift and place test was found to be the superior predictor in performance of four job tasks; a pack lift and place (R(2) = 0.76), artillery gunner loading simulation (R(2) = 0.36), bombing up an M1 tank simulation, (R(2) = 0.47) and a bridge building simulation (R(2) = 0.63). Pull-ups and push-ups were poor predictors of performance in the majority of job tasks. Although the box lift and place had a larger correlation with the artillery gunner loading task than the generic assessment, it only accounted for 36% of the variance, indicating that a task simulation may be more appropriate to assess soldiers' capacity to perform this job task. These results support the use of a box lift and place rather than generic fitness tests for the evaluation of military manual handling tasks.
士兵们要接受定期体能测试以评估他们的功能能力。然而,当前的体能测试,如俯卧撑、仰卧起坐和引体向上,并不一定能评估特定工作所需的体能。本文评估了通用预测测试和与任务相关的预测测试在预测四项关键军事体力搬运任务表现方面的效用。结果发现,箱式搬运测试在四项工作任务的表现预测方面是更优的预测指标;包括背包搬运(R² = 0.76)、炮兵装填模拟(R² = 0.36)、M1坦克装弹模拟(R² = 0.47)以及桥梁搭建模拟(R² = 0.63)。在大多数工作任务中,引体向上和俯卧撑对表现的预测能力较差。虽然箱式搬运测试与炮兵装填任务的相关性比通用评估更大,但它仅解释了36%的方差,这表明任务模拟可能更适合评估士兵执行这项工作任务的能力。这些结果支持使用箱式搬运测试而非通用体能测试来评估军事体力搬运任务。