Beck Ben, Ham Daniel J, Best Stuart A, Carstairs Greg L, Savage Robert J, Straney Lahn, Caldwell Joanne N
Land Division, Defence Science and Technology Group, Fishermans Bend, Australia.
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 5;11(7):e0158418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158418. eCollection 2016.
Repetitive manual handling tasks account for a substantial portion of work-related injuries. However, few studies report endurance time in repetitive manual handling tasks. Consequently, there is little guidance to inform expected work time for repetitive manual handling tasks. We aimed to investigate endurance time and oxygen consumption of a repetitive lift and carry task using linear mixed models.
Fourteen male soldiers (age 22.4 ± 4.5 yrs, height 1.78 ± 0.04 m, body mass 76.3 ± 10.1 kg) conducted four assessment sessions that consisted of one maximal box lifting session and three lift and carry sessions. The relationships between carry mass (range 17.5-37.5 kg) and the duration of carry, and carry mass and oxygen consumption, were assessed using linear mixed models with random effects to account for between-subject variation.
Results demonstrated that endurance time was inversely associated with carry mass (R2 = 0.24), with significant individual-level variation (R2 = 0.85). Normalising carry mass to performance in a maximal box lifting test improved the prediction of endurance time (R2 = 0.40). Oxygen consumption presented relative to total mass (body mass, external load and carried mass) was not significantly related to lift and carry mass (β1 = 0.16, SE = 0.10, 95%CI: -0.04, 0.36, p = 0.12), indicating that there was no change in oxygen consumption relative to total mass with increasing lift and carry mass.
Practically, these data can be used to guide work-rest schedules and provide insight into methods assessing the physical capacity of workers conducting repetitive manual handling tasks.
重复性手工操作任务在与工作相关的伤害中占很大比例。然而,很少有研究报告重复性手工操作任务中的耐力时间。因此,对于重复性手工操作任务的预期工作时间几乎没有指导意见。我们旨在使用线性混合模型研究重复性提举和搬运任务的耐力时间和耗氧量。
14名男性士兵(年龄22.4±4.5岁,身高1.78±0.04米,体重76.3±10.1千克)进行了四次评估,包括一次最大重量举箱测试和三次提举与搬运测试。使用具有随机效应的线性混合模型评估搬运重量(范围17.5 - 37.5千克)与搬运持续时间以及搬运重量与耗氧量之间的关系,以考虑个体间差异。
结果表明,耐力时间与搬运重量呈负相关(R2 = 0.24),个体水平存在显著差异(R2 = 0.85)。将搬运重量标准化为最大重量举箱测试中的表现可改善对耐力时间的预测(R2 = 0.40)。相对于总质量(体重、外部负荷和搬运重量)呈现的耗氧量与提举和搬运重量无显著相关性(β1 = 0.16,标准误 = 0.10,95%置信区间:-0.04,0.36,p = 0.12),这表明随着提举和搬运重量增加,相对于总质量的耗氧量没有变化。
实际上,这些数据可用于指导工作休息时间表,并深入了解评估从事重复性手工操作任务的工人身体能力的方法。