• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于随机化检验反演的单病例效应量测量的置信区间。

Confidence intervals for single-case effect size measures based on randomization test inversion.

作者信息

Michiels Bart, Heyvaert Mieke, Meulders Ann, Onghena Patrick

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2017 Feb;49(1):363-381. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0714-4.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-016-0714-4
PMID:26927003
Abstract

In the current paper, we present a method to construct nonparametric confidence intervals (CIs) for single-case effect size measures in the context of various single-case designs. We use the relationship between a two-sided statistical hypothesis test at significance level α and a 100 (1 - α) % two-sided CI to construct CIs for any effect size measure θ that contain all point null hypothesis θ values that cannot be rejected by the hypothesis test at significance level α. This method of hypothesis test inversion (HTI) can be employed using a randomization test as the statistical hypothesis test in order to construct a nonparametric CI for θ. We will refer to this procedure as randomization test inversion (RTI). We illustrate RTI in a situation in which θ is the unstandardized and the standardized difference in means between two treatments in a completely randomized single-case design. Additionally, we demonstrate how RTI can be extended to other types of single-case designs. Finally, we discuss a few challenges for RTI as well as possibilities when using the method with other effect size measures, such as rank-based nonoverlap indices. Supplementary to this paper, we provide easy-to-use R code, which allows the user to construct nonparametric CIs according to the proposed method.

摘要

在本文中,我们提出了一种方法,用于在各种单病例设计的背景下为单病例效应量度量构建非参数置信区间(CI)。我们利用在显著性水平α下的双侧统计假设检验与100(1 - α)%双侧CI之间的关系,为任何效应量度量θ构建置信区间,该区间包含在显著性水平α下不能被假设检验拒绝的所有点零假设θ值。这种假设检验反演(HTI)方法可以使用随机化检验作为统计假设检验来构建θ的非参数置信区间。我们将此过程称为随机化检验反演(RTI)。我们在完全随机单病例设计中,以θ为两种处理之间均值的未标准化和标准化差异的情况下说明RTI。此外,我们展示了RTI如何扩展到其他类型的单病例设计。最后,我们讨论了RTI面临的一些挑战以及将该方法与其他效应量度量(如基于秩的非重叠指数)一起使用时的可能性。作为本文的补充,我们提供了易于使用的R代码,用户可以根据所提出的方法构建非参数置信区间。

相似文献

1
Confidence intervals for single-case effect size measures based on randomization test inversion.基于随机化检验反演的单病例效应量测量的置信区间。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Feb;49(1):363-381. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0714-4.
2
Nonparametric meta-analysis for single-case research: Confidence intervals for combined effect sizes.非参数元分析在单案例研究中的应用:合并效应量的置信区间。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Jun;51(3):1145-1160. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1044-5.
3
Exact confidence intervals for the average causal effect on a binary outcome.二元结局平均因果效应的精确置信区间。
Stat Med. 2016 Mar 15;35(6):957-60. doi: 10.1002/sim.6764.
4
Statistical inference by confidence intervals: issues of interpretation and utilization.基于置信区间的统计推断:解释与应用问题
Phys Ther. 1999 Feb;79(2):186-95.
5
Exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for proportion difference in the presence of incomplete data.存在不完全数据时比例差异的精确和近似无条件置信区间。
Stat Med. 2009 Feb 15;28(4):625-41. doi: 10.1002/sim.3490.
6
On design considerations and randomization-based inference for community intervention trials.关于社区干预试验的设计考量及基于随机化的推断
Stat Med. 1996 Jun 15;15(11):1069-92. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960615)15:11<1069::AID-SIM220>3.0.CO;2-Q.
7
On exact randomization-based covariate-adjusted confidence intervals.基于精确随机化的协变量调整置信区间。
Biometrics. 2024 Mar 27;80(2). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae051.
8
Replicability and randomization test logic in behavior analysis.行为分析中的可重复性和随机化测试逻辑。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2019 Mar;111(2):329-341. doi: 10.1002/jeab.501. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
9
Reducing the width of confidence intervals for the difference between two population means by inverting adaptive tests.通过反转自适应检验来缩小两个总体均值差值的置信区间宽度。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 May;27(5):1422-1436. doi: 10.1177/0962280216661745. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
10
Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists.效应量、置信区间与统计显著性:生物学家实用指南
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007 Nov;82(4):591-605. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00027.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Harnessing Available Evidence in Single-Case Experimental Studies: The Use of Multilevel Meta-Analysis.利用单病例实验研究中的现有证据:多层次荟萃分析的应用。
Psychol Belg. 2024 Oct 25;64(1):166-184. doi: 10.5334/pb.1307. eCollection 2024.
2
Effect of Advanced Footwear Technology Spikes on Sprint Acceleration: A Multiple N-of-1 Trial.先进的跑鞋技术鞋钉对短跑加速的影响:一项多例单一受试者试验。
Sports Med Open. 2024 Aug 30;10(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00758-w.
3
Testing delayed, gradual, and temporary treatment effects in randomized single-case experiments: A general response function framework.
在随机单案例实验中测试延迟、渐进和临时的治疗效果:一般响应函数框架。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Apr;56(4):3915-3936. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02230-1. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
4
A proposal for the assessment of replication of effects in single-case experimental designs.关于评估单病例实验设计中效应复制的建议。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2022 Jun;55(3):997-1024. doi: 10.1002/jaba.923. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
5
Quantitative Techniques and Graphical Representations for Interpreting Results from Alternating Treatment Design.用于解释交替治疗设计结果的定量技术和图形表示法。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2021 May 13;45(1):259-294. doi: 10.1007/s40614-021-00289-9. eCollection 2022 Mar.
6
A Priori Justification for Effect Measures in Single-Case Experimental Designs.单案例实验设计中效应量度的先验正当性
Perspect Behav Sci. 2021 Mar 25;45(1):153-186. doi: 10.1007/s40614-021-00282-2. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
A Randomized Case Series Approach to Testing Efficacy of Interventions for Minimally Verbal Autistic Children.一种用于测试针对极少言语自闭症儿童干预措施疗效的随机病例系列研究方法。
Front Psychol. 2021 May 24;12:621920. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.621920. eCollection 2021.
8
A systematic review of applied single-case research published between 2016 and 2018: Study designs, randomization, data aspects, and data analysis.2016 年至 2018 年发表的应用单病例研究的系统评价:研究设计、随机化、数据方面和数据分析。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Aug;53(4):1371-1384. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01502-4. Epub 2020 Oct 26.