Tang Man-Lai, Ling Man-Ho, Tian Guo-Liang
Department of Mathematics, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Stat Med. 2009 Feb 15;28(4):625-41. doi: 10.1002/sim.3490.
Confidence interval (CI) construction with respect to proportion/rate difference for paired binary data has become a standard procedure in many clinical trials and medical studies. When the sample size is small and incomplete data are present, asymptotic CIs may be dubious and exact CIs are not yet available. In this article, we propose exact and approximate unconditional test-based methods for constructing CI for proportion/rate difference in the presence of incomplete paired binary data. Approaches based on one- and two-sided Wald's tests will be considered. Unlike asymptotic CI estimators, exact unconditional CI estimators always guarantee their coverage probabilities at or above the pre-specified confidence level. Our empirical studies further show that (i) approximate unconditional CI estimators usually yield shorter expected confidence width (ECW) with their coverage probabilities being well controlled around the pre-specified confidence level; and (ii) the ECWs of the unconditional two-sided-test-based CI estimators are generally narrower than those of the unconditional one-sided-test-based CI estimators. Moreover, ECWs of asymptotic CIs may not necessarily be narrower than those of two-sided-based exact unconditional CIs. Two real examples will be used to illustrate our methodologies.
对于配对二元数据的比例/率差构建置信区间(CI),已成为许多临床试验和医学研究中的标准程序。当样本量较小且存在不完全数据时,渐近置信区间可能不可靠,而精确置信区间尚不可用。在本文中,我们提出了精确和近似的基于无条件检验的方法,用于在存在不完全配对二元数据的情况下构建比例/率差的置信区间。将考虑基于单侧和双侧Wald检验的方法。与渐近置信区间估计量不同,精确无条件置信区间估计量始终保证其覆盖概率在或高于预先指定的置信水平。我们的实证研究进一步表明:(i)近似无条件置信区间估计量通常会产生较短的期望置信宽度(ECW),其覆盖概率在预先指定的置信水平附近得到很好的控制;(ii)基于无条件双侧检验的置信区间估计量的ECW通常比基于无条件单侧检验的置信区间估计量的ECW更窄。此外,渐近置信区间的ECW不一定比基于双侧的精确无条件置信区间的ECW更窄。将使用两个实际例子来说明我们的方法。