Datta Niloy R, Rogers Susanne, Ordóñez Silvia Gómez, Puric Emsad, Bodis Stephan
a Centre for Radiation Oncology , KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital , Aarau , Switzerland and.
b Department of Radiation Oncology , University Hospital , Zurich , Switzerland.
Int J Hyperthermia. 2016;32(1):31-40. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2015.1099746. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the outcome of controlled clinical trials in head and neck cancers (HNCs) using hyperthermia and radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone.
A total of 498 abstracts were screened from four databases and hand searched as per the PRISMA guidelines. Only two-arm studies treating HNCs with either radiotherapy alone, or hyperthermia and radiotherapy without concurrent chemotherapy or surgery were considered. The evaluated end point was complete response (CR).
Following a detailed screening of the titles, abstracts and full text papers, six articles fulfilling the above eligibility criteria were considered. In total 451 clinical cases from six studies were included in the meta-analysis. Five of six trials were randomised. The overall CR with radiotherapy alone was 39.6% (92/232) and varied between 31.3% and 46.9% across the six trials. With thermoradiotherapy, the overall CR reported was 62.5% (137/219), (range 33.9-83.3%). The odds ratio was 2.92 (95% CI: 1.58-5.42, p = 0.001); the risk ratio was 1.61 (95% CI: 1.32-1.97, p < 0.0001) and the risk difference was 0.25 (95% CI: 0.12-0.39, p < 0.0001), all in favour of combined treatment with hyperthermia and radiotherapy over radiotherapy alone. Acute and late grade III/IV toxicities were reported to be similar in both the groups.
Hyperthermia along with radiotherapy enhances the likelihood of CR in HNCs by around 25% compared to radiotherapy alone with no significant additional acute and late morbidities. This level I evidence should justify the integration of hyperthermia into the multimodality therapy of HNCs.
进行一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估头颈部癌(HNC)采用热疗联合放疗与单纯放疗的对照临床试验结果。
根据PRISMA指南,从四个数据库中筛选出共498篇摘要并进行手工检索。仅纳入采用单纯放疗或热疗联合放疗治疗HNC且无同步化疗或手术的双臂研究。评估的终点为完全缓解(CR)。
在对标题、摘要和全文进行详细筛选后,纳入了6篇符合上述纳入标准的文章。荟萃分析共纳入了来自6项研究的451例临床病例。6项试验中有5项为随机试验。单纯放疗的总体CR为39.6%(92/232),在6项试验中,其范围为31.3%至46.9%。热放疗的总体CR报告为62.5%(137/219)(范围33.9 - 83.3%)。优势比为2.92(95% CI:1.58 - 5.42,p = 0.001);风险比为1.61(95% CI:1.32 - 1.97,p < 0.0001),风险差为0.25(95% CI:0.12 - 0.39,p < 0.0001),所有结果均表明热疗联合放疗优于单纯放疗。据报告,两组的急性和晚期III/IV级毒性相似。
与单纯放疗相比,热疗联合放疗可使HNC的CR可能性提高约25%,且无显著额外的急性和晚期发病率。这一I级证据应证明将热疗纳入HNC的多模式治疗是合理的。