Anand Shruti, Tripathi Siddhi, Chopra Anubhav, Khaneja Karan, Agarwal Swatantra
B.D.S, M.D.S (Prosthodontics and Implantology), Delhi, India.
Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Kothiwal Dental College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2015 Apr-Jun;15(2):125-30. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.155033.
The purpose was to examine the existence of divine proportions among the Indian faces in Moradabad population.
Totally, 100 patients (50 males; 50 females) aged 25-45 years were selected for the study. All facial photographs were analyzed based on the method of Ricketts assessing the divine proportions in vertical and transverse facial planes. Six horizontal and seven vertical ratios were determined, which were then compared with the phi ratio.
The horizontal ratio results showed that three male and female ratios were not significantly different from each other (P > 0.05), and interchilion/nose width ratio was highly significant (P < 0.001). The horizontal mean ratios for females as well as males were highly significant from the phi ratio (P < 0.001) except for interchilion/interdacryon ratio, which was significant (P < 0.05) for females and not significant (P > 0.05) for males. The vertical ratio results showed that there was a highly significant difference (P < 0.001) for forehead height/stomion-soft menton ratio and no significant difference for two ratios between the mean ratios of males and females. All the vertical mean ratios for both the groups were highly significant (P < 0.001), except for the intereye-soft menton/intereye-stomion ratio, which was significant (P < 0.05) for female group and not significant (P > 0.05) for the male group.
Although, the golden proportion is a prominent and recurring theme in esthetics, it should not be embraced as the only method by which human beauty is measured to the exclusion of others factors.
本研究旨在探究莫拉达巴德地区印度人群面部是否存在黄金比例。
本研究共选取了100名年龄在25至45岁之间的患者(50名男性;50名女性)。所有面部照片均根据里氏评估面部垂直和横向平面黄金比例的方法进行分析。确定了六个水平比例和七个垂直比例,然后将其与黄金分割率进行比较。
水平比例结果显示,三个男女比例之间无显著差异(P>0.05),而唇间/鼻宽比例差异极显著(P<0.001)。除唇间/泪间比例外,女性和男性的水平平均比例与黄金分割率差异均极显著(P<0.001),该比例女性差异显著(P<0.05),男性差异不显著(P>0.05)。垂直比例结果显示,额高/口裂-软颏比例差异极显著(P<0.001),男女平均比例之间的两个比例无显著差异。两组的所有垂直平均比例差异均极显著(P<0.001),但眼间-软颏/眼间-口裂比例除外,该比例女性组差异显著(P<0.05),男性组差异不显著(P>0.05)。
尽管黄金比例是美学中一个突出且反复出现的主题,但不应将其作为衡量人类美的唯一方法而排除其他因素。