Larsen Britta A, Wassel Christina L, Kritchevsky Stephen B, Strotmeyer Elsa S, Criqui Michael H, Kanaya Alka M, Fried Linda F, Schwartz Ann V, Harris Tamara B, Ix Joachim H
Department of Family Medicine and Public Health (B.A.L., M.H.C., I.X.), and Department of Medicine (J.H.I.), University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California 92093-0628; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (C.L.W.), College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05446; Wake Forest University and School of Medicine (S.B.K.), Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157; Graduate School of Public Health (E.S.S.), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219; Division of General Internal Medicine (A.M.K.), Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (A.V.S.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System (L.F.F.), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261; and National Institute on Aging (T.B.H.), Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Apr;101(4):1847-55. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-3643. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
Skeletal muscle plays a key role in glucose regulation, yet the association between muscle quantity or quality and the risk of developing type 2 diabetes has not been explored.
The objective of the study was to assess the association between muscle quantity and strength and incident diabetes and to explore whether this association differs by body mass index (BMI) category.
Participants were 2166 older adults in the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study who were free of diabetes at baseline (1997–1998). Computed tomography and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry were used to measure abdominal and thigh muscle area and total body lean mass, respectively. Strength was quantified by grip and knee extensions.
Incident diabetes, defined as fasting glucose of 126 mg/dL or greater, a physician's diagnosis, and/or the use of hypoglycemic medication were measured.
After a median 11.3 years of follow-up, there were 265 incident diabetes cases (12.2%). In fully adjusted models, no association was found between muscle or strength measures and incident diabetes (for all, P > .05). For women, there was a significant interaction with BMI category for both abdominal and thigh muscle, such that greater muscle predicted lower risk of incident diabetes for normal-weight women (hazard ratio 0.37 [0.17–0.83] and 0.58 [0.27–1.27] per SD, respectively) and a greater risk for overweight and obese women (hazard ratio 1.23 [0.98–1.54] and 1.28 [1.00–1.64], respectively). No significant interactions by BMI category existed for strength measures or any measures for men (for all, P > .05).
Greater muscle area is associated with a lower risk of incident diabetes for older normal-weight women but not for men or overweight women.
骨骼肌在葡萄糖调节中起关键作用,但肌肉量或质量与2型糖尿病发病风险之间的关联尚未得到研究。
本研究旨在评估肌肉量和力量与糖尿病发病之间的关联,并探讨这种关联是否因体重指数(BMI)类别而异。
参与者为健康、衰老与身体成分研究中的2166名老年人,他们在基线时(1997 - 1998年)无糖尿病。分别使用计算机断层扫描和双能X线吸收法测量腹部和大腿肌肉面积以及全身瘦体重。通过握力和膝关节伸展来量化力量。
测量新发糖尿病,定义为空腹血糖126mg/dL或更高、医生诊断以及/或者使用降糖药物。
经过中位11.3年的随访,有265例新发糖尿病病例(12.2%)。在完全调整模型中,未发现肌肉或力量指标与新发糖尿病之间存在关联(所有P > 0.05)。对于女性,腹部和大腿肌肉与BMI类别均存在显著交互作用,即对于正常体重女性,肌肉量增加预示着新发糖尿病风险较低(每标准差的风险比分别为0.37[0.17 - 0.83]和0.58[0.27 - 1.27]),而对于超重和肥胖女性则风险更高(风险比分别为1.23[0.98 - 1.54]和1.28[1.00 - 1.64])。对于男性,力量指标或任何测量指标与BMI类别均不存在显著交互作用(所有P > 0.05)。
更大的肌肉面积与老年正常体重女性较低的新发糖尿病风险相关,但与男性或超重女性无关。