Majumdar Sumit R, Josse Robert G, Lin Mu, Eurich Dean T
Department of Medicine (S.R.M.), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G3, Canada; Alliance for Health Outcomes Research in Diabetes at the Alberta Diabetes Institute (S.R.M., D.T.E.), Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G3, Canada; Department of Medicine (R.G.J.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (R.G.J.), St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada; and School of Public Health (M.L., D.T.E.), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G3, Canada.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 May;101(5):1963-9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-4180. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
Type 2 diabetes and osteoporosis are both common, chronic, and increase with age, whereas type 2 diabetes is also a risk factor for major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs). However, different treatments for type 2 diabetes can affect fracture risk differently, with metaanalyses showing some agents increase risk (eg, thiazolidinediones) and some reduce risk (eg, sitagliptin).
To determine the independent association between new use of sitagliptin and MOF in a large population-based cohort study.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: A sitagliptin new user study design employing a nationally representative Unites States claims database of 72 738 insured patients with type 2 diabetes. We used 90-day time-varying sitagliptin exposure windows and controlled confounding by using multivariable analyses that adjusted for clinical data, comorbidities, and time-updated propensity scores.
We compared the incidence of MOF (hip, clinical spine, proximal humerus, distal radius) in new users of sitagliptin vs nonusers over a median 2.2 years follow-up.
At baseline, the median age was 52 years, 54% were men, and median A1c was 7.5%. There were 8894 new users of sitagliptin and 63 834 nonusers with a total 181 139 person-years of follow-up. There were 741 MOF (79 hip fractures), with 53 fractures (4.8 per 1000 person-years) among new users of sitagliptin vs 688 fractures (4.0 per 1000 person-years) among nonusers (P = .3 for difference). In multivariable analyses, sitagliptin was not associated with fracture (adjusted hazard ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval 0.8-1.4; P = .7), although insulin (P < .001), sulfonylureas (P < .008), and thiazolidinedione (P = .019) were each independently associated with increased fracture risk.
Even in a young population with type 2 diabetes, osteoporotic fractures were not uncommon. New use of sitagliptin was not associated with fracture, but other commonly used second-line agents for type 2 diabetes were associated with increased risk. These data should be considered when making treatment decisions for those with type 2 diabetes at particularly high risk of fractures.
2型糖尿病和骨质疏松症都是常见的慢性疾病,且发病率随年龄增长而增加,2型糖尿病也是严重骨质疏松性骨折(MOF)的一个危险因素。然而,2型糖尿病的不同治疗方法对骨折风险的影响各不相同,荟萃分析表明,某些药物会增加风险(如噻唑烷二酮类),而某些药物则会降低风险(如西他列汀)。
在一项基于人群的大型队列研究中确定西他列汀新使用者与严重骨质疏松性骨折之间的独立关联。
设计、研究地点和研究对象:采用美国全国代表性保险索赔数据库中72738例2型糖尿病参保患者的西他列汀新使用者研究设计。我们使用90天随时间变化的西他列汀暴露窗口,并通过多变量分析控制混杂因素,该分析对临床数据、合并症和随时间更新的倾向评分进行了调整。
在中位2.2年的随访期内,我们比较了西他列汀新使用者与非使用者中严重骨质疏松性骨折(髋部、临床脊柱、肱骨近端、桡骨远端)的发生率。
基线时,中位年龄为52岁,54%为男性,中位糖化血红蛋白(A1c)为7.5%。有8894名西他列汀新使用者和63834名非使用者参与研究,总随访人年数为181139人年。共有741例严重骨质疏松性骨折(79例髋部骨折),其中西他列汀新使用者中有53例骨折(每1000人年4.8例),非使用者中有688例骨折(每1000人年4.0例)(差异P = 0.3)。在多变量分析中,西他列汀与骨折无关(调整后的风险比为1.1,95%置信区间为0.8 - 1.4;P = 0.7),尽管胰岛素(P < 0.001)、磺脲类药物(P < 0.008)和噻唑烷二酮类药物(P = 0.019)均与骨折风险增加独立相关。
即使在患有2型糖尿病的年轻人群中,骨质疏松性骨折也并不罕见。新使用西他列汀与骨折无关,但2型糖尿病其他常用的二线药物与骨折风险增加有关。对于骨折风险特别高的2型糖尿病患者,在做出治疗决策时应考虑这些数据。