Suppr超能文献

[使用塑料材料的近端修复体质量评估:影像学研究]

[Evaluation of the quality of proximal restorations with plastic materials: radiographic study].

作者信息

Karimi Z, Kessa S, Chala S, Abdallaoui F

出版信息

Odontostomatol Trop. 2015 Sep;38(151):5-12.

Abstract

AIM

To assess the quality of proximal coronary restorations and bring out the factors influencing this quality.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A transversal study on 160 radiographs of proximal coronary restorations was conducted at the University Center of Dental Consultation and Treatment of Rabat. Restorations were evaluated according to the modified USPHS criteria. Four variables were studied: restoration material, treated tooth, cavity type and location of treatment in order to identify the influencing factors.

RESULTS

Forty five per cent of the evaluated proximal coronary restorations required replacement. The main cause of failure was recurrent caries in 36% of cases, followed by the absence of the contact point (24.4%), unacceptable proximal coronary outline (13.8%), and finally dentin exposure (6.9%). Thus, it turned out that there is a difficulty to restore correctly posterior proximal cavities especially using amalgam and a high rate of recurrent caries at both the anterior and posterior teeth.

CONCLUSION

Both a clinical and a radiographic evaluation after each proximal restoration would be recommended to reduce failure.

摘要

目的

评估近端冠状动脉修复体的质量,并找出影响该质量的因素。

材料与方法

在拉巴特大学牙科咨询与治疗中心对160张近端冠状动脉修复体的X光片进行了一项横向研究。根据改良的美国公共卫生署(USPHS)标准对修复体进行评估。研究了四个变量:修复材料、治疗牙齿、龋洞类型和治疗位置,以确定影响因素。

结果

45%的评估近端冠状动脉修复体需要更换。失败的主要原因是36%的病例出现复发性龋齿,其次是接触点缺失(24.4%)、近端冠状动脉外形不可接受(13.8%),最后是牙本质暴露(6.9%)。因此,事实证明,正确修复后牙近端龋洞存在困难,尤其是使用汞合金时,并且前后牙的复发性龋齿发生率都很高。

结论

建议在每次近端修复后进行临床和影像学评估,以减少失败率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验