• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[使用塑料材料的近端修复体质量评估:影像学研究]

[Evaluation of the quality of proximal restorations with plastic materials: radiographic study].

作者信息

Karimi Z, Kessa S, Chala S, Abdallaoui F

出版信息

Odontostomatol Trop. 2015 Sep;38(151):5-12.

PMID:26930769
Abstract

AIM

To assess the quality of proximal coronary restorations and bring out the factors influencing this quality.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A transversal study on 160 radiographs of proximal coronary restorations was conducted at the University Center of Dental Consultation and Treatment of Rabat. Restorations were evaluated according to the modified USPHS criteria. Four variables were studied: restoration material, treated tooth, cavity type and location of treatment in order to identify the influencing factors.

RESULTS

Forty five per cent of the evaluated proximal coronary restorations required replacement. The main cause of failure was recurrent caries in 36% of cases, followed by the absence of the contact point (24.4%), unacceptable proximal coronary outline (13.8%), and finally dentin exposure (6.9%). Thus, it turned out that there is a difficulty to restore correctly posterior proximal cavities especially using amalgam and a high rate of recurrent caries at both the anterior and posterior teeth.

CONCLUSION

Both a clinical and a radiographic evaluation after each proximal restoration would be recommended to reduce failure.

摘要

目的

评估近端冠状动脉修复体的质量,并找出影响该质量的因素。

材料与方法

在拉巴特大学牙科咨询与治疗中心对160张近端冠状动脉修复体的X光片进行了一项横向研究。根据改良的美国公共卫生署(USPHS)标准对修复体进行评估。研究了四个变量:修复材料、治疗牙齿、龋洞类型和治疗位置,以确定影响因素。

结果

45%的评估近端冠状动脉修复体需要更换。失败的主要原因是36%的病例出现复发性龋齿,其次是接触点缺失(24.4%)、近端冠状动脉外形不可接受(13.8%),最后是牙本质暴露(6.9%)。因此,事实证明,正确修复后牙近端龋洞存在困难,尤其是使用汞合金时,并且前后牙的复发性龋齿发生率都很高。

结论

建议在每次近端修复后进行临床和影像学评估,以减少失败率。

相似文献

1
[Evaluation of the quality of proximal restorations with plastic materials: radiographic study].[使用塑料材料的近端修复体质量评估:影像学研究]
Odontostomatol Trop. 2015 Sep;38(151):5-12.
2
Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.直接后牙修复的临床结果与新进展
Am J Dent. 2000 Nov;13(Spec No):41D-54D.
3
A study of primary teeth restored by intracoronal restorations in children participating in an undergraduate teaching programme at Cork University Dental School and Hospital, Ireland.对爱尔兰科克大学牙科学院和医院参与本科教学项目的儿童中采用冠内修复治疗的乳牙进行的一项研究。
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015 Mar;16(1):78-82.
4
An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.三种修复材料抗继发龋性能的体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Nov;110(5):363-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.011. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
5
Higher experience of caries and lower income trajectory influence the quality of restorations: A multilevel analysis in a birth cohort.龋病体验较高和收入轨迹较低会影响修复体的质量:出生队列的多层次分析。
J Dent. 2018 Jan;68:79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.11.009. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
6
Clinical evaluation of the performance and safety of a new dentine substitute, Biodentine, in the restoration of posterior teeth - a prospective study.一种新型牙本质替代物 Biodentine 在修复后牙中的性能和安全性的临床评估 - 一项前瞻性研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Jan;17(1):243-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0701-9. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
7
Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.高 C 因素窝洞树脂复合材料修复体的耐用性:12 年随访。
J Dent. 2010 Jun;38(6):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
8
Do socioeconomic determinants affect the quality of posterior dental restorations? A multilevel approach.社会经济决定因素会影响后牙修复体的质量吗?一种多层次研究方法。
J Dent. 2013 Nov;41(11):960-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.02.010. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
9
Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.乳牙粘结修复的随机临床试验。18个月的结果。
Am J Dent. 2013 Dec;26(6):351-5.
10
Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.直接树脂复合材料修复体与间接复合嵌体:一年的结果。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2010 May 1;11(3):025-32.