Kosar Christina, Steinberg Karen, de Silva Nicole, Avitzur Yaron, Wales Paul W
Group for Improvement of Intestinal Function and Treatment (GIFT), The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Canada.
Group for Improvement of Intestinal Function and Treatment (GIFT), The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Canada; Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Canada.
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 May;51(5):798-803. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.02.026. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
Survival of children with intestinal failure has improved over the last decade, resulting in increased health care expenditures. Our objective was to determine outpatient costs for the first year after primary discharge.
A retrospective analysis was performed in pediatric intestinal failure (PIF) patients between 2010 and 2012. Patients were stratified into 3 groups (1=enteral support with no devices [7 patients], 2=enteral support with devices (gastrostomy and/or ostomy) [19 patients], 3=home parenteral nutrition (HPN) [22 patients]). Data abstraction included clinical characteristics and costs related to medication, enteral/parenteral nutrition, and supplies were calculated. Data were analyzed using one way ANOVA.
Forty-eight patients (mean age 7.6months; 31 males [65%]) were studied. See attached table for results. HPN patients had significantly more ambulatory visits (p<0.0001), number of admitted days (p=0.01), and productive days lost (p<0.0001). Total cost of care was significantly higher for HPN patients (mean=$320,368.50, p<0.0001) when compared to other groups. Costs covered by the health care system were significantly higher for patients on HPN (mean=$316,101.56, p<0.0001).
The outpatient expenditures to care for PIF patients in the first year post primary discharge are significant. Our single payer health care system supports the majority of costs, but families are also incurring expenses related to travel and lost productivity. Children on HPN have more visits to hospital, but have access to more funding options. Children solely on gastrostomy or stoma therapy, however, have a significantly greater personal financial burden.
在过去十年中,肠衰竭患儿的生存率有所提高,这导致了医疗保健支出的增加。我们的目标是确定初次出院后第一年的门诊费用。
对2010年至2012年间的儿科肠衰竭(PIF)患者进行回顾性分析。患者被分为3组(1=无设备的肠内支持[7例患者],2=有设备(胃造口术和/或造口术)的肠内支持[19例患者],3=家庭肠外营养(HPN)[22例患者])。数据提取包括临床特征以及与药物、肠内/肠外营养和用品相关的费用计算。使用单因素方差分析对数据进行分析。
研究了48例患者(平均年龄7.6个月;31例男性[65%])。结果见附表。接受HPN治疗的患者门诊就诊次数显著更多(p<0.0001)、住院天数(p=0.01)和损失的工作日数显著更多(p<0.0001)。与其他组相比,HPN患者的总护理费用显著更高(平均=320,368.50美元,p<0.0001)。HPN患者由医疗保健系统支付的费用显著更高(平均=316,101.56美元,p<0.0001)。
初次出院后第一年护理PIF患者的门诊费用很高。我们的单一支付者医疗保健系统承担了大部分费用,但家庭也产生了与旅行和生产力损失相关费用。接受HPN治疗的儿童住院就诊次数更多,但有更多的资金选择。然而,仅接受胃造口术或造口治疗的儿童个人财务负担明显更大。