Cook-Darzens Solange
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Hôpital Robert Debré, 48 Boulevard Sérurier, 75019, Paris, France.
, 10 Grande Rue, 60460, Blaincourt, France.
Eat Weight Disord. 2016 Sep;21(3):383-393. doi: 10.1007/s40519-016-0263-y. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
Family meal research is a fast growing field that has significant implications for the prevention and treatment of eating disorders (ED). Using a scoping review procedure, this article overviewed major historical and clinical trends that have guided the use of family meals or lunch sessions in adolescent ED family therapy over the past 40 years, and synthesized essential findings from current therapeutic family meal research. The relevant body of literature is reported within the framework of three models of family therapy (Maudsley model, family-based treatment, multi-family therapy), with a focus on their specific use of family lunch sessions and related empirical evidence. Although promising, current evidence remains contradictory, tentative and colored by therapists' convictions, resistance and fears. Future research priorities are discussed, including the need for a more direct examination of the impact of the family meal practice on therapeutic change, as well as a better understanding of its active ingredients and of the characteristics of patients/families that may benefit most from it. This review of the literature may help clinicians and family therapists (1) adhere more reliably and confidently to ED-focused treatment protocols that include a strong family meal component, and (2) make more informed decisions regarding the inclusion or exclusion of family meals in their practice. When feasibility or acceptability issues preclude their use, alternatives to family meals are also discussed, including family meal role-plays and drawings, coaching of home-based family meals and manual/DVD-based guidance.
家庭聚餐研究是一个快速发展的领域,对饮食失调(ED)的预防和治疗具有重要意义。本文采用范围综述程序,概述了过去40年中指导青少年饮食失调家庭治疗中使用家庭聚餐或午餐环节的主要历史和临床趋势,并综合了当前治疗性家庭聚餐研究的重要发现。相关文献在三种家庭治疗模式(莫兹利模式、家庭式治疗、多家庭治疗)的框架内进行报告,重点关注它们对家庭午餐环节的具体使用情况及相关实证证据。尽管前景乐观,但目前的证据仍然相互矛盾、具有试探性,且受到治疗师的信念、抵触情绪和恐惧的影响。文中讨论了未来的研究重点,包括需要更直接地考察家庭聚餐实践对治疗变化的影响,以及更好地理解其有效成分和可能最受益于此的患者/家庭的特征。这篇文献综述可能有助于临床医生和家庭治疗师:(1)更可靠、自信地遵循以饮食失调为重点且包含强大的家庭聚餐组成部分的治疗方案;(2)就是否在实践中纳入或排除家庭聚餐做出更明智的决策。当可行性或可接受性问题妨碍使用家庭聚餐时,还讨论了家庭聚餐的替代方法,包括家庭聚餐角色扮演和绘图、居家家庭聚餐指导以及基于手册/ DVD的指导。