• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用 MODS 和 NEMS 并结合加拿大安大略省重症监护信息系统 (CCIS) 中的其他六个独立变量,开发一种 ICU 入住后前 24 小时的区域性 ICU 死亡率预测模型。

To develop a regional ICU mortality prediction model during the first 24 h of ICU admission utilizing MODS and NEMS with six other independent variables from the Critical Care Information System (CCIS) Ontario, Canada.

机构信息

Department of National Defense, Royal Canadian Medical Services, 1745 Alta Vista Drive, Ottawa, K1A 0K6 Ontario Canada ; London Health Sciences Center, Divisions of Critical Care and Robarts Research Institute, Western University, 800 Commissioner's Rd E., London, Ontario N6A 5W9 Canada ; Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, 677 Huntington Ave., Boston, 02115 MA USA.

London Health Sciences Center, Divisions of Critical Care and Robarts Research Institute, Western University, 800 Commissioner's Rd E., London, Ontario N6A 5W9 Canada.

出版信息

J Intensive Care. 2016 Feb 29;4:16. doi: 10.1186/s40560-016-0143-6. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1186/s40560-016-0143-6
PMID:26933498
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4772333/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intensive care unit (ICU) scoring systems or prediction models evolved to meet the desire of clinical and administrative leaders to assess the quality of care provided by their ICUs. The Critical Care Information System (CCIS) is province-wide data information for all Ontario, Canada level 3 and level 2 ICUs collected for this purpose. With the dataset, we developed a multivariable logistic regression ICU mortality prediction model during the first 24 h of ICU admission utilizing the explanatory variables including the two validated scores, Multiple Organs Dysfunctional Score (MODS) and Nine Equivalents Nursing Manpower Use Score (NEMS) followed by the variables age, sex, readmission to the ICU during the same hospital stay, admission diagnosis, source of admission, and the modified Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI) collected through the hospital health records.

METHODS

This study is a single-center retrospective cohort review of 8822 records from the Critical Care Trauma Centre (CCTC) and Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit (MSICU) of London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC), Ontario, Canada between 1 Jan 2009 to 30 Nov 2012. Multivariable logistic regression on training dataset (n = 4321) was used to develop the model and validate by bootstrapping method on the testing dataset (n = 4501). Discrimination, calibration, and overall model performance were also assessed.

RESULTS

The predictors significantly associated with ICU mortality included: age (p < 0.001), source of admission (p < 0.0001), ICU admitting diagnosis (p < 0.0001), MODS (p < 0.0001), and NEMS (p < 0.0001). The variables sex and modified CCI were not significantly associated with ICU mortality. The training dataset for the developed model has good discriminating ability between patients with high risk and those with low risk of mortality (c-statistic 0.787). The Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test has a strong correlation between the observed and expected ICU mortality (χ (2) = 5.48; p > 0.31). The overall optimism of the estimation between the training and testing data set ΔAUC = 0.003, indicating a stable prediction model.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that CCIS data available after the first 24 h of ICU admission at LHSC can be used to create a robust mortality prediction model with acceptable fit statistic and internal validity for valid benchmarking and monitoring ICU performance.

摘要

背景

重症监护病房(ICU)评分系统或预测模型的发展是为了满足临床和管理领导者评估 ICU 提供的护理质量的愿望。Critical Care Information System(CCIS)是为安大略省所有 3 级和 2 级 ICU 收集的全省数据信息。有了这个数据集,我们利用包括两个经过验证的评分在内的解释变量,即多器官功能障碍评分(MODS)和 9 个等效护理人力使用评分(NEMS),在 ICU 入住后的前 24 小时内开发了一个多变量逻辑回归 ICU 死亡率预测模型,随后是年龄、性别、同一住院期间再次入住 ICU、入院诊断、入院来源和通过医院健康记录收集的改良 Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)等变量。

方法

这项研究是对安大略省伦敦健康科学中心(LHSC)重症监护创伤中心(CCTC)和内科-外科重症监护病房(MSICU)的 8822 份记录进行的单中心回顾性队列研究,这些记录的时间为 2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2012 年 11 月 30 日。对训练数据集(n=4321)进行多变量逻辑回归,使用bootstrap 方法对测试数据集(n=4501)进行验证。还评估了区分度、校准度和整体模型性能。

结果

与 ICU 死亡率显著相关的预测因子包括:年龄(p<0.001)、入院来源(p<0.0001)、ICU 入院诊断(p<0.0001)、MODS(p<0.0001)和 NEMS(p<0.0001)。性别和改良 CCI 这两个变量与 ICU 死亡率没有显著关联。该模型的训练数据集在高风险和低风险死亡率患者之间具有良好的区分能力(c 统计量为 0.787)。Hosmer 和 Lemeshow 拟合优度检验显示观察到的 ICU 死亡率与预期死亡率之间具有很强的相关性(χ²=5.48;p>0.31)。训练数据集和测试数据集之间的整体预测值差异为 AUCΔ=0.003,表明预测模型稳定。

结论

这项研究表明,LHSC ICU 入住后的前 24 小时内可用的 CCIS 数据可用于创建一个稳健的死亡率预测模型,该模型具有可接受的拟合统计量和内部有效性,可用于有效的基准测试和 ICU 绩效监测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a58f/4772333/d33517fb7e25/40560_2016_143_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a58f/4772333/9ed82ff400ec/40560_2016_143_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a58f/4772333/d33517fb7e25/40560_2016_143_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a58f/4772333/9ed82ff400ec/40560_2016_143_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a58f/4772333/d33517fb7e25/40560_2016_143_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
To develop a regional ICU mortality prediction model during the first 24 h of ICU admission utilizing MODS and NEMS with six other independent variables from the Critical Care Information System (CCIS) Ontario, Canada.利用 MODS 和 NEMS 并结合加拿大安大略省重症监护信息系统 (CCIS) 中的其他六个独立变量,开发一种 ICU 入住后前 24 小时的区域性 ICU 死亡率预测模型。
J Intensive Care. 2016 Feb 29;4:16. doi: 10.1186/s40560-016-0143-6. eCollection 2016.
2
Correction to: To develop a regional ICU mortality prediction model during the first 24 h of ICU admission utilizing MODS and NEMS with six other independent variables from the critical care information system (CCIS) Ontario, Canada.更正为:利用多器官功能障碍综合征(MODS)和新生儿急诊医学评分(NEMS)以及来自加拿大安大略省重症监护信息系统(CCIS)的其他六个独立变量,开发一种在重症监护病房(ICU)入院后最初24小时内的区域ICU死亡率预测模型。
J Intensive Care. 2020 Jan 14;8:9. doi: 10.1186/s40560-019-0421-1. eCollection 2020.
3
External validation of a prognostic model for intensive care unit mortality: a retrospective study using the Ontario Critical Care Information System.使用安大略省重症监护信息系统对 ICU 死亡率预后模型进行外部验证:一项回顾性研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2020 Aug;67(8):981-991. doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01686-5. Epub 2020 May 7.
4
Predicting Mortality in Low-Income Country ICUs: The Rwanda Mortality Probability Model (R-MPM).预测低收入国家重症监护病房的死亡率:卢旺达死亡率概率模型(R-MPM)。
PLoS One. 2016 May 19;11(5):e0155858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155858. eCollection 2016.
5
Prediction of outcome in intensive care unit trauma patients: a multicenter study of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE), Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS), and a 24-hour intensive care unit (ICU) point system.重症监护病房创伤患者预后的预测:急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)、创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)以及24小时重症监护病房(ICU)评分系统的多中心研究
J Trauma. 1999 Aug;47(2):324-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199908000-00017.
6
Veterans Affairs intensive care unit risk adjustment model: validation, updating, recalibration.退伍军人事务部重症监护病房风险调整模型:验证、更新、重新校准
Crit Care Med. 2008 Apr;36(4):1031-42. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318169f290.
7
Accuracy of a composite score using daily SAPS II and LOD scores for predicting hospital mortality in ICU patients hospitalized for more than 72 h.使用每日序贯器官衰竭评估(SAPS)II 评分和住院死亡概率(LOD)评分的综合评分预测入住重症监护病房(ICU)超过72小时患者医院死亡率的准确性。
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Jun;27(6):1012-21. doi: 10.1007/s001340100961.
8
Forecasting ICU Census by Combining Time Series and Survival Models.结合时间序列模型和生存模型预测重症监护病房床位需求
Crit Care Explor. 2023 May 5;5(5):e0912. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000912. eCollection 2023 May.
9
Predictive accuracy of severity scoring system: a prospective cohort study using APACHE III in a Korean intensive care unit.严重程度评分系统的预测准确性:一项在韩国重症监护病房使用APACHE III的前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2003 Mar;40(3):219-26. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(02)00062-7.
10
The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation III outcome prediction in patients admitted to the intensive care unit after pneumonectomy.肺切除术后入住重症监护病房患者的急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估III结局预测
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007 Dec;21(6):832-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2006.12.005. Epub 2007 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of predictive scoring systems in predicting mortality in relation to baseline kidney function in adult intensive care unit patients: a systematic review protocol.预测评分系统对成人重症监护病房患者基线肾功能相关死亡率的预测效果:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 17;15(7):e098192. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098192.
2
Comparison of risk-adjusted cumulative quality control charts compared with standardized mortality ratios in critical care.重症监护中风险调整后的累积质量控制图与标准化死亡率之比的比较。
Can J Anaesth. 2025 Feb;72(2):353-363. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02863-6. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
3
Forecasting ICU Census by Combining Time Series and Survival Models.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of a medical emergency team follow-up programme on patients discharged from the medical intensive care unit to the general ward: a single-centre experience.医疗急救团队随访方案对从重症监护病房转至普通病房的患者的影响:单中心经验。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2016 Jun;22(3):356-62. doi: 10.1111/jep.12485. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
2
Evaluation of illness severity scoring systems and risk prediction in vascular intensive care admissions.血管重症监护病房入院患者疾病严重程度评分系统及风险预测的评估
Vascular. 2016 Aug;24(4):390-403. doi: 10.1177/1708538115604089. Epub 2015 Oct 18.
3
Negotiating Transitions: Involvement of Critical Care Outreach Teams in End-of-Life Decision Making.
结合时间序列模型和生存模型预测重症监护病房床位需求
Crit Care Explor. 2023 May 5;5(5):e0912. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000912. eCollection 2023 May.
4
Red blood cell distribution width and Charlson comorbidity index help to identify frail polytraumatized patients : Experiences from a level I trauma center.红细胞分布宽度和 Charlson 合并症指数有助于识别虚弱的多发创伤患者:来自一级创伤中心的经验。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2023 Oct;135(19-20):538-544. doi: 10.1007/s00508-022-02063-6. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
5
Utilizing heart rate variability to predict ICU patient outcome in traumatic brain injury.利用心率变异性预测创伤性脑损伤 ICU 患者的结局。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2020 Dec 14;21(Suppl 17):481. doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-03814-w.
6
Development and validation of a machine learning-based prediction model for near-term in-hospital mortality among patients with COVID-19.基于机器学习的新型冠状病毒肺炎患者短期院内死亡预测模型的开发与验证
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Sep 22. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002602.
7
External validation of a prognostic model for intensive care unit mortality: a retrospective study using the Ontario Critical Care Information System.使用安大略省重症监护信息系统对 ICU 死亡率预后模型进行外部验证:一项回顾性研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2020 Aug;67(8):981-991. doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01686-5. Epub 2020 May 7.
8
Correction to: To develop a regional ICU mortality prediction model during the first 24 h of ICU admission utilizing MODS and NEMS with six other independent variables from the critical care information system (CCIS) Ontario, Canada.更正为:利用多器官功能障碍综合征(MODS)和新生儿急诊医学评分(NEMS)以及来自加拿大安大略省重症监护信息系统(CCIS)的其他六个独立变量,开发一种在重症监护病房(ICU)入院后最初24小时内的区域ICU死亡率预测模型。
J Intensive Care. 2020 Jan 14;8:9. doi: 10.1186/s40560-019-0421-1. eCollection 2020.
协商过渡:重症监护外展团队参与临终决策制定
Am J Crit Care. 2015 May;24(3):232-40. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2015715.
4
Prognostic value of different scoring models in patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome associated with acute COPD exacerbation.不同评分模型在急性慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重期伴多器官功能障碍综合征患者中的预后价值
J Thorac Dis. 2015 Mar;7(3):329-36. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.11.27.
5
ICU severity of illness scores: APACHE, SAPS and MPM.重症监护病房疾病严重程度评分:急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE)、简化急性生理学评分(SAPS)和死亡率预测模型(MPM)。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014 Oct;20(5):557-65. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000135.
6
Risk prediction of hospital mortality for adult patients admitted to Australian and New Zealand intensive care units: development and validation of the Australian and New Zealand Risk of Death model.澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护病房成年患者住院死亡率的风险预测:澳大利亚和新西兰死亡风险模型的建立和验证。
J Crit Care. 2013 Dec;28(6):935-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.07.058. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
7
Critical care transition programs and the risk of readmission or death after discharge from an ICU: a systematic review and meta-analysis.重症监护病房出院后过渡护理计划与再入院或死亡风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Jan;42(1):179-87. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a272c0.
8
The rapid response system and end-of-life care.快速反应系统和临终关怀。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2013 Dec;19(6):616-23. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283636be2.
9
The association between ICU readmission rate and patient outcomes.ICU 再入院率与患者预后的关系。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Jan;41(1):24-33. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182657b8a.
10
Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries.使用来自 6 个国家的数据更新和验证 Charlson 合并症指数和评分,以用于医院出院摘要的风险调整。
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Mar 15;173(6):676-82. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq433. Epub 2011 Feb 17.