Edwards Mark S, Edwards Elizabeth J, Lyvers Michael
a School of Psychology , Bond University , Gold Coast , Queensland , Australia.
Cogn Emot. 2017 Jun;31(4):671-686. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1152232. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
Few studies have focussed on the link between anxiety and inhibitory control in the absence of stimulus-driven external threat. This two-part experiment examined the interactions between (1) somatic trait anxiety, somatic situational stress (i.e. threat of electric shock), and effort, and (2) cognitive trait anxiety, cognitive situational stress (i.e. ego-threat instructions), and effort, on inhibitory processes using a Go-No-Go paradigm. Trait anxiety was operationalised using questionnaire scores and effort was operationalised using a visual analogue scale. Performance effectiveness was measured using the d' parameter from signal detection theory and processing efficiency was indexed by the ratio of d' to response time on correct trials. Results indicated that somatic trait anxiety and stress did not predict effectiveness or efficiency. Cognitive trait anxiety and stress were associated with both inhibitory effectiveness and efficiency deficits; however, contrary to expectations these deficits were evident at higher rather than lower mental effort. Results suggest a distinction between how somatic and cognitive anxiety manifest on tasks involving inhibitory control.
很少有研究关注在没有刺激驱动的外部威胁情况下焦虑与抑制控制之间的联系。这个两部分的实验使用了一个Go-No-Go范式,研究了(1)躯体特质焦虑、躯体情境压力(即电击威胁)和努力,以及(2)认知特质焦虑、认知情境压力(即自我威胁指令)和努力,在抑制过程中的相互作用。特质焦虑通过问卷得分来操作化,努力通过视觉模拟量表来操作化。使用信号检测理论中的d'参数来测量表现有效性,通过正确试验中d'与反应时间的比率来衡量加工效率。结果表明,躯体特质焦虑和压力并不能预测有效性或效率。认知特质焦虑和压力与抑制有效性和效率缺陷都有关联;然而,与预期相反,这些缺陷在较高而非较低的心理努力水平上更为明显。结果表明,在涉及抑制控制的任务中,躯体焦虑和认知焦虑的表现存在差异。