Eppley K R, Abrams A I, Shear J
J Clin Psychol. 1989 Nov;45(6):957-74. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198911)45:6<957::aid-jclp2270450622>3.0.co;2-q.
Hand and computer searches located studies on the effects of relaxation techniques on trait anxiety. Effect sizes for the different treatments (e.g., Progressive Relaxation, EMG Biofeedback, various forms of meditation, etc.) were calculated. Most of the treatments produced similar effect sizes except that Transcendental Meditation had significantly larger effect size (p less than .005), and meditation that involved concentration had significantly smaller effect. Correlations with effect size were calculated for many variables, e.g., population, age, sex, experimental design, duration and hours of treatment, pretest anxiety, demand characteristics, experimenter attitude, type of publication, attrition, etc. Only a few variables (mainly population, duration, hours, and attrition) significantly influenced effect size. Controlling for possible confounding variables did not alter the overall conclusions. The difference in effect size between treatments was maintained both when only published studies were included and when only the studies with the strongest design were included. Possible explanations for the findings are examined.
通过手工检索和计算机检索,找到了关于放松技巧对特质焦虑影响的研究。计算了不同治疗方法(如渐进性放松、肌电图生物反馈、各种形式的冥想等)的效应量。除超验冥想的效应量显著更大(p小于0.005),以及涉及专注的冥想效应量显著更小外,大多数治疗方法产生的效应量相似。计算了许多变量与效应量的相关性,如人群、年龄、性别、实验设计、治疗持续时间和时长、预测试焦虑、需求特征、实验者态度、出版物类型、损耗等。只有少数变量(主要是人群、持续时间、时长和损耗)对效应量有显著影响。控制可能的混杂变量并没有改变总体结论。当只纳入已发表的研究以及只纳入设计最强的研究时,治疗方法之间效应量的差异都保持不变。对这些发现的可能解释进行了探讨。