Campbell Duncan G, Bonner Laura M, Bolkan Cory R, Lanto Andrew B, Zivin Kara, Waltz Thomas J, Klap Ruth, Rubenstein Lisa V, Chaney Edmund F
Department of Psychology, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ann Behav Med. 2016 Aug;50(4):533-44. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9780-1.
Whereas stigma regarding mental health concerns exists, the evidence for stigma as a depression treatment barrier among patients in Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care (PC) is mixed.
This study tests whether stigma, defined as depression label avoidance, predicted patients' preferences for depression treatment providers, patients' prospective engagement in depression care, and care quality.
We conducted cross-sectional and prospective analyses of existing data from 761 VA PC patients with probable major depression.
Relative to low-stigma patients, those with high stigma were less likely to prefer treatment from mental health specialists. In prospective controlled analyses, high stigma predicted lower likelihood of the following: taking medications for mood, treatment by mental health specialists, treatment for emotional concerns in PC, and appropriate depression care.
High stigma is associated with lower preferences for care from mental health specialists and confers risk for minimal depression treatment engagement.
尽管存在对心理健康问题的污名化现象,但关于污名化作为退伍军人事务部(VA)初级保健(PC)患者抑郁症治疗障碍的证据并不一致。
本研究检验了被定义为避免抑郁症标签的污名化是否能预测患者对抑郁症治疗提供者的偏好、患者对抑郁症护理的预期参与度以及护理质量。
我们对761名可能患有重度抑郁症的VA初级保健患者的现有数据进行了横断面和前瞻性分析。
与低污名化患者相比,高污名化患者更不愿意接受心理健康专家的治疗。在前瞻性对照分析中,高污名化预示着以下情况发生的可能性较低:服用情绪调节药物、接受心理健康专家治疗、在初级保健中治疗情绪问题以及接受适当的抑郁症护理。
高污名化与对心理健康专家护理的较低偏好相关,并带来抑郁症治疗参与度极低的风险。