Madson Michael B, Villarosa Margo C, Schumacher Julie A, Mohn Richard S
The University of Southern Mississippi.
The University of Southern Mississippi.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Jun;65:51-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
The Client Evaluation of Motivational Interviewing scale (CEMI) is a measure for assessing client perceptions of clinicians' use of motivational interviewing (MI). This study explored the factorial, convergent and predictive validity of the CEMI with a sample of 137 college students who completed a brief motivational intervention for alcohol harm reduction. A two factor structure was confirmed, supporting previous findings of relational and technical subscales. The CEMI technical subscale partially mediated an increase in readiness to change drinking, while the relational subscale did not. Higher scores on CEMI technical subscale predicted higher scores on the tasks, bond and goals subscales of the Working Alliance Inventory while higher scores on the CEMI relationship subscale predicted an increase in the goals subscale. Finally, the correlations between the CEMI subscales and observer-rated MI spirit score and MI adherent and non-adherent behavioral counts were in the expected directions but did not reach statistical significance. Further revision and evaluation of the CEMI is recommended. Clinical, training and research implications are provided.
动机性访谈量表的来访者评估(CEMI)是一种用于评估来访者对临床医生使用动机性访谈(MI)的看法的测量工具。本研究以137名大学生为样本,探讨了CEMI的因子效度、收敛效度和预测效度,这些学生完成了一项简短的减少酒精危害的动机性干预。确认了一个双因素结构,支持了先前关于关系和技术子量表的研究结果。CEMI技术子量表部分介导了饮酒改变意愿的增加,而关系子量表则没有。CEMI技术子量表得分越高,在工作联盟量表的任务、联结和目标子量表上的得分越高;而CEMI关系子量表得分越高,则预示着目标子量表得分增加。最后,CEMI子量表与观察者评定的MI精神得分以及MI依从和不依从行为计数之间的相关性符合预期方向,但未达到统计学显著性。建议对CEMI进行进一步修订和评估。提供了临床、培训和研究方面的启示。