Leach R H, Costas M, Mitchelmore D L
National Collection of Type Cultures, Central Public Health Laboratory, London, UK.
J Gen Microbiol. 1989 Nov;135(11):2993-3000. doi: 10.1099/00221287-135-11-2993.
Twenty-five strains classified as Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides LC or subsp. capri have been compared by one-dimensional SDS-PAGE of their cellular proteins. A computerized numerical analysis revealed that the protein patterns of all but two aberrant strains formed one large phenon that separated clearly from representatives of the four other members of the 'M. mycoides cluster' at a similarity level (S) of 66% and which remained undivided at up to 78% S. At higher similarity levels, these strains fell heterogeneously into mixed sub-phenons containing strains of both subspecies. Serological comparisons by immunofluorescence largely confirmed the subspecies designations of the test strains, but also showed that some were serologically intermediate between subsp. mycoides and subsp. capri, being cross-reactive with both. These results confirm and enlarge upon those of our earlier studies indicating the protein-pattern inseparability of subsp. capri and subsp. mycoides LC strains and their distinctiveness from the classical M. mycoides subsp. mycoides SC strains and other members of the 'M. mycoides cluster'. As also recognized by other workers, subsp. mycoides LC and subsp. capri strains appear to comprise one large group, wherein those most readily identifiable as either type lie at either end of a serological spectrum that also contains serologically cross-reactive strains. Our observations therefore suggest the lines along which the three groups classified at present within the species M. mycoides (SC and LC strains of subsp. mycoides; subsp. capri) might eventually be reclassified, subject to direct genomic comparisons.
已通过对25株归类为丝状支原体丝状亚种LC或山羊亚种的菌株的细胞蛋白进行一维SDS-PAGE分析,对它们进行了比较。计算机化数值分析显示,除两株异常菌株外,所有菌株的蛋白质图谱形成了一个大的显型,该显型在相似度(S)为66%时与“丝状支原体簇”的其他四个成员的代表明显分开,并且在高达78%的S水平上仍未分开。在更高的相似度水平下,这些菌株异质性地落入包含两个亚种菌株的混合亚显型中。通过免疫荧光进行的血清学比较在很大程度上证实了测试菌株的亚种分类,但也表明一些菌株在血清学上介于丝状亚种和山羊亚种之间,与两者都有交叉反应。这些结果证实并扩展了我们早期研究的结果,表明山羊亚种和丝状支原体亚种LC菌株的蛋白质图谱不可区分,以及它们与经典的丝状支原体丝状亚种SC菌株和“丝状支原体簇”的其他成员的区别。正如其他研究人员所认识到的,丝状支原体亚种LC和山羊亚种菌株似乎构成一个大的群体,其中最容易被鉴定为任何一种类型的菌株位于血清学谱的两端,该谱中还包含血清学交叉反应菌株。因此,我们的观察结果表明了目前在丝状支原体物种内分类的三组(丝状支原体亚种的SC和LC菌株;山羊亚种)最终可能重新分类的方向,但需进行直接的基因组比较。