Pivko Susan E, Abbruzzese Laurel D, Duttaroy Pragati, Hansen Ruth L, Ryans Kathryn
Dep. of Physical Therapy, School of Health Sciences, College of Staten Island, 2800 Victory Blvd., Bldg 5N, Rm 207, Staten Island, NY 10314, USA. Tel 862-485-0905, fax 718-982-2984.
J Allied Health. 2016 Spring;45(1):33-40.
Physical therapy clinical education experiences (CEEs) are difficult to secure, particularly first-level CEEs. Our purpose was to determine 1) what impact student full-time CEEs have on PT clinician productivity and 2) whether there is a productivity difference between first vs final CEEs.
Productivity logs, including possible factors impacting productivity, were distributed to clinician-student pairings on first and final CEEs. Two-week baseline data (without a student) were compared to weeks 1 and 6 (with a student) for 31 logs using a 2x4 repeated-measures ANOVA. In a subset of 17 logs for CEEs 8 weeks or longer, a 2x5 repeated-measures ANOVA was performed.
There was a significant increase in the number of patients seen and CPT units billed by both levels of CEEs comparing weeks 1 and 6. In the subset of CEEs, 8 weeks or longer, there was a significant increase in the number of patients treated per hour at week 6 and a trend toward a change at week 8 when compared to baseline week A. The factors selected as impacting productivity were census (59%) and staffing (32%).
Physical therapy clinician-student pairings showed an overall increase in productivity during both full-time first and final level CEEs.
物理治疗临床教育经历(CEEs)很难获得,尤其是一级CEEs。我们的目的是确定:1)学生全日制CEEs对物理治疗临床医生的工作效率有何影响;2)首次与最后一次CEEs之间在工作效率上是否存在差异。
将包括可能影响工作效率的因素的工作效率日志分发给首次和最后一次CEEs的临床医生-学生配对。使用2×4重复测量方差分析,将31份日志的两周基线数据(无学生)与第1周和第6周(有学生)的数据进行比较。在17份为期8周或更长时间的CEEs日志子集中,进行了2×5重复测量方差分析。
与第1周和第6周相比,两个级别的CEEs的看诊患者数量和计费的CPT单位均显著增加。在为期8周或更长时间的CEEs子集中,与基线A周相比,第6周每小时治疗的患者数量显著增加,第8周有变化趋势。被选为影响工作效率的因素是人口普查(59%)和人员配备(32%)。
在全日制首次和最后一级CEEs期间,物理治疗临床医生-学生配对的工作效率总体上有所提高。