Mitch Wolden is the professor at the University of Jamestown, 4190 26th Avenue South, Fargo, North Dakota 58104 (
Cindy Flom-Meland is the professor and is a program director and Chair at the University of North Dakota.
J Phys Ther Educ. 2024 Sep 1;38(3):239-248. doi: 10.1097/JTE.0000000000000342. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
INTRODUCTION/REVIEW OF LITERATURE: There is wide variability in the length of full-time clinical education experiences (CEEs) among Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) programs. We investigated academic and clinical faculty perspectives on the optimal length and level of agreement on the length, timing, and offering of full-time CEEs.
A survey assessing perspectives on the optimal length and level of agreement for the length, timing, and offering of full-time CEEs was completed by 100 academic and 240 clinical faculty.
Differences between academic and clinical faculty responses on the optimal length and level of agreement were assessed with a 2-sample test of proportions and 2-sample t -test.
Participants believed that the length of full-time CEEs (in weeks) should be single CEE 10.6 (SD 2.3); first CEE 7.8 (SD 2.1); terminal CEE 12.5 (SD 5.4); integrated CEE 9.6 (SD 1.9); and total CEEs 37.2 (SD 6.9). There were significant differences (MD = -3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] -4.6 to -1.6) between academic and clinical faculty perspectives for the total length of CEEs. No significant differences between academic and clinical faculty perspectives for the length of single, first, terminal, or integrated CEEs. There were significant differences between academic and clinical faculty perspectives for the optimal length of inpatient (MD = 1.1; 95% CI 0.6-1.6) and specialty (MD = 0.8; 95% CI 0.2-1.3) settings. There were significant differences between academic and clinical faculty level of agreement for 8 of 15 items.
There was consistency between academic and clinical faculty regarding the perceived optimal length of full-time CEEs. Academic and clinical faculty perspectives for the optimal length of terminal full-time CEEs (12.5 weeks) were different than those for the national average (21.8 weeks) length of terminal full-time CEEs. Our study provides evidence to support DPT programs' clinical education curriculum decisions regarding the length of full-time CEEs to optimize students learning and maturation.
简介/文献回顾:物理治疗博士(DPT)课程的全职临床教育经历(CEE)长度差异很大。我们调查了学术和临床教师对全职 CEE 的最佳长度、一致性水平以及长度、时间和提供方式的看法。
一项评估学术和临床教师对全职 CEE 最佳长度和一致性水平看法的调查,由 100 名学术教师和 240 名临床教师完成。
采用两样本比例检验和两样本 t 检验评估学术和临床教师在最佳长度和一致性水平上的反应差异。
参与者认为全职 CEE 的长度(以周为单位)应为单一 CEE 10.6(SD 2.3);第一 CEE 7.8(SD 2.1);终端 CEE 12.5(SD 5.4);综合 CEE 9.6(SD 1.9);总 CEE 37.2(SD 6.9)。在全职 CEE 总长度方面,学术和临床教师的观点存在显著差异(MD=-3.0;95%置信区间[CI] -4.6 至-1.6)。在单一、第一、终端或综合 CEE 的长度方面,学术和临床教师的观点没有显著差异。在住院(MD=1.1;95%CI 0.6-1.6)和专业(MD=0.8;95%CI 0.2-1.3)设置的最佳长度方面,学术和临床教师的观点存在显著差异。在 15 项中的 8 项中,学术和临床教师的一致性水平存在显著差异。
学术和临床教师在全职 CEE 的最佳长度方面存在一致性。学术和临床教师对终端全职 CEE(12.5 周)的最佳长度的看法与终端全职 CEE 的全国平均长度(21.8 周)不同。我们的研究为 DPT 课程的临床教育课程决策提供了证据,以确定全职 CEE 的长度,从而优化学生的学习和成熟度。