Suppr超能文献

系统支气管内超声引导下纵隔分期与正电子发射断层扫描在非小细胞肺癌根治性放疗前综合纵隔分期中的比较:一项初步研究

Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Mediastinal Staging Versus Positron Emission Tomography for Comprehensive Mediastinal Staging in NSCLC Before Radical Radiotherapy of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Pilot Study.

作者信息

Steinfort Daniel P, Siva Shankar, Leong Tracy L, Rose Morgan, Herath Dishan, Antippa Phillip, Ball David L, Irving Louis B

机构信息

From the Department of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne (DPS, LBI); Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne (DPS, TLL, LBI); Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville (DPS, MR, LBI); Department of Respiratory Medicine, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton (DPS); Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne (SS, DLB); Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne (SS, DLB); Department of Nuclear Medicine (DG); Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville (PA); and Department of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute (PA), East Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(8):e2488. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002488.

Abstract

Despite known limitations of positron emission tomography (PET) for mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), radiation treatment fields are generally based on PET-identified disease extent. However, no studies have examined the accuracy of FDG-PET/CT on a per-node basis in patients being considered for curative-intent radiotherapy in NSCLC.In a prospective trial, patients with NSCLC being considered for definitive thoracic radiotherapy (± systemic chemotherapy) underwent minimally invasive systematic mediastinal evaluation with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) following noninvasive staging with integrated PET-CT.Thirty patients underwent EBUS-TBNA, with TBNA performed from a mean 2.5 lymph node (LN) stations per patient (median 3, range 1-5). Discordant findings between PET-CT and EBUS-TBNA were observed in 10 patients (33%, 95% CI 19%-51%). PET-occult LN metastases were demonstrated by EBUS in 4 patients, whereas a lesser extent of mediastinal involvement, compared with FDG-PET, was demonstrated by EBUS in 6 patients, including 2 patients downstaged from cN3 to pN2. LNs upstaged by EBUS were significantly smaller than nodes downstaged by EBUS, 7.5 mm (range 7-9) versus 12 mm (range 6-21), P = 0.005.A significant proportion of patients considered for definitive radiotherapy (+/-chemotherapy) undergoing systematic mediastinal evaluation with EBUS-TBNA in this study have an extent of mediastinal NSCLC involvement discordant with that indicated by PET-CT. Systematic EBUS-TBNA may aid in defining the extent of mediastinal involvement in NSCLC patients undergoing radiotherapy. Systematic EBUS-TBNA has the potential to contribute significantly to radiotherapy planning and delivery, by either identifying occult nodal metastases, or demonstrating FDG-avid LNs to be disease-free.

摘要

尽管正电子发射断层扫描(PET)在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)纵隔分期方面存在已知局限性,但放射治疗野通常基于PET确定的疾病范围。然而,尚无研究在考虑进行NSCLC根治性放疗的患者中,逐个淋巴结地检查FDG-PET/CT的准确性。

在一项前瞻性试验中,考虑进行确定性胸部放疗(±全身化疗)的NSCLC患者在进行PET-CT综合无创分期后,接受了支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸活检(EBUS-TBNA)的微创系统性纵隔评估。30例患者接受了EBUS-TBNA,每位患者平均从2.5个淋巴结(LN)站进行TBNA(中位数3,范围1-5)。10例患者(33%,95%CI 19%-51%)观察到PET-CT与EBUS-TBNA之间存在不一致的结果。EBUS在4例患者中发现了PET隐匿性LN转移,而EBUS在6例患者中显示纵隔受累程度低于FDG-PET,包括2例从cN3降期至pN2的患者。EBUS上调分期的LN明显小于下调分期的LN,分别为7.5mm(范围7-9)和12mm(范围6-21),P = 0.005。

在本研究中,相当一部分考虑进行确定性放疗(±化疗)并接受EBUS-TBNA系统性纵隔评估的患者,其NSCLC纵隔受累程度与PET-CT所示不一致。系统性EBUS-TBNA可能有助于确定接受放疗的NSCLC患者纵隔受累的程度。系统性EBUS-TBNA有潜力通过识别隐匿性淋巴结转移或证明FDG摄取的LN无疾病,对放疗计划和实施做出重大贡献。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验