Millbank Jenni
J Law Med. 2015 Dec;23(2):346-64.
This article considers the question: how might Australian regulators constructively respond to the dynamic and complex challenges posed by cross-border assisted reproduction? To begin, the article summarises the available international scholarship and outlines what little we know about Australian cross-border reproductive travel. Of the three generally proposed responses to cross-border reproductive care (prohibition, harm minimisation and harmonisation), the article summarily rejects the first approach, and instead discusses a mixture of the latter two. The article proposes the beginnings of an immediate policy response aimed not at stopping cross-border practices per se, but rather at understanding and reducing the risks associated with them, as well as flagging the pursuit of more ambitious meta-goals such as developing more equitable and accessible treatment frameworks for assisted reproductive technology and encouraging domestic self-sufficiency in reproduction.
澳大利亚监管机构如何建设性地应对跨境辅助生殖带来的动态和复杂挑战?首先,本文总结了现有的国际学术研究,并概述了我们对澳大利亚跨境生殖旅行所知甚少的情况。对于跨境生殖护理通常提出的三种应对措施(禁止、危害最小化和协调统一),本文直接摒弃了第一种方法,转而讨论后两种方法的结合。本文提出了初步的政策应对措施,目的不是要阻止跨境行为本身,而是要了解并降低与之相关的风险,同时表明追求更宏伟的总体目标,比如为辅助生殖技术制定更公平、更易获得的治疗框架,以及鼓励国内在生殖方面实现自给自足。