Suppr超能文献

在二硫化碳暴露水平低于5 ppm的工人中,没有心血管毒性的证据。

No evidence of cardiovascular toxicity in workers exposed below 5 ppm carbon disulfide.

作者信息

Domergue Jérôme, Lison Dominique, Haufroid Vincent

机构信息

Centre inter-entreprises et artisanal de Médecine du travail, 45 rue des Vinaigriers, 75010, Paris, France.

Louvain centre for Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (LTAP), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016 Jul;89(5):835-45. doi: 10.1007/s00420-016-1122-x. Epub 2016 Mar 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Carbon disulfide (CS2), used in the viscose process, is well known for having multiple health effects, including on the cardiovascular system, in workers with long-term exposure higher than 10 ppm. The mechanisms of those effects are, however, not precisely defined, and it remains uncertain whether cardiovascular toxicity may occur at exposure levels lower than 10 ppm. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore the health impact of low CS2 exposure levels using an array of preclinical biomarkers of cardiovascular risk.

METHODS

Exposure intensity was determined by measuring urinary 2-thiothiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid (TTCA) in 117 workers from two plants using the viscose process, sampled in multiples phases (2003, 2006 and 2013). A cumulative exposure index (CEI) and a recent exposure index (REI) were calculated for each worker, and shiftwork was documented to account for potential confounding. Cardiovascular parameters included blood pressure, total, LDL and HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, C-reactive protein dosed in serum with high sensitivity (HsCRP), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and albuminuria/creatininuria ratio (UACR). Potential biological confounders were fasting blood glucose and serum creatinine. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to trace relationships between cardiovascular risk biomarkers and other variables, including CEI, REI and shiftwork duration.

RESULTS

Median REI and CEI were 0.05 mg TTCA/g creat and 21.5 mg TTCA/g creat*months, respectively. While expected associations, such as between HsCRP and LDL Cholesterol, were found, significant associations between cardiovascular risk markers and CS2 exposure indexes (CEI or REI) were not detected. Shiftwork duration was positively associated with UACR in workers with elevated fasting blood glucose.

CONCLUSION

In practice, when CS2 exposure levels are kept below 5 ppm (TTCA < 2.2 mg/g creat), it does not appear useful to perform a systematic monitoring of total serum cholesterol or its subfractions, or of the new biomarkers of cardiovascular risk (NTproBNP, HsCRP, UACR) investigated in the present study. It appears important to carefully monitor the existence of diabetes that may justify avoiding shiftwork.

摘要

目的

二硫化碳(CS2)用于粘胶生产过程,长期暴露于高于10 ppm的CS2环境中的工人,其对包括心血管系统在内的多种健康影响已为人熟知。然而,这些影响的机制尚未明确界定,且暴露水平低于10 ppm时是否会发生心血管毒性仍不确定。因此,本研究的目的是使用一系列心血管风险的临床前生物标志物,探讨低水平CS2暴露对健康的影响。

方法

通过测量来自两家采用粘胶生产工艺工厂的117名工人尿液中的2-硫代噻唑烷-4-羧酸(TTCA)来确定暴露强度,在多个阶段(2003年、2006年和2013年)进行采样。为每位工人计算累积暴露指数(CEI)和近期暴露指数(REI),并记录轮班工作情况以考虑潜在的混杂因素。心血管参数包括血压、血清总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、甘油三酯、高敏C反应蛋白(HsCRP)、N端脑钠肽前体以及白蛋白尿/肌酐尿比值(UACR)。潜在的生物学混杂因素为空腹血糖和血清肌酐。采用双变量和多变量回归分析来追踪心血管风险生物标志物与其他变量之间的关系,包括CEI、REI和轮班工作时长。

结果

REI和CEI的中位数分别为0.05 mg TTCA/g肌酐和21.5 mg TTCA/g肌酐·月。虽然发现了一些预期的关联,如HsCRP与低密度脂蛋白胆固醇之间的关联,但未检测到心血管风险标志物与CS2暴露指数(CEI或REI)之间的显著关联。在空腹血糖升高的工人中,轮班工作时长与UACR呈正相关。

结论

在实际操作中,当CS2暴露水平保持在5 ppm以下(TTCA < 2.2 mg/g肌酐)时,对血清总胆固醇及其亚组分或本研究中调查的心血管风险新生物标志物(NTproBNP、HsCRP、UACR)进行系统监测似乎并无用处。仔细监测是否存在糖尿病很重要,因为这可能成为避免轮班工作的理由。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验