评论“心理科学可重复性的估计”。

Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science".

机构信息

Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

出版信息

Science. 2016 Mar 4;351(6277):1037. doi: 10.1126/science.aad7243.

DOI:10.1126/science.aad7243

PMID:26941311

Abstract

A paper from the Open Science Collaboration (Research Articles, 28 August 2015, aac4716) attempting to replicate 100 published studies suggests that the reproducibility of psychological science is surprisingly low. We show that this article contains three statistical errors and provides no support for such a conclusion. Indeed, the data are consistent with the opposite conclusion, namely, that the reproducibility of psychological science is quite high.

摘要

一篇来自开放科学协作组织（研究文章，2015 年 8 月 28 日，aac4716）的论文试图复制 100 项已发表的研究，结果表明心理学科学的可重复性低得惊人。我们表明，这篇文章包含三个统计错误，并且没有为这样的结论提供支持。事实上，这些数据与相反的结论是一致的，即心理学科学的可重复性相当高。