Singer Benjamin D, Mock Jason R, D'Alessio Franco R, Aggarwal Neil R, Mandke Pooja, Johnston Laura, Damarla Mahendra
Johns Hopkins University Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Johns Hopkins University Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2016 May 1;310(9):L796-801. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00334.2015. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
Flow cytometry is a powerful tool capable of simultaneously analyzing multiple parameters on a cell-by-cell basis. Lung tissue preparation for flow cytometry requires creation of a single-cell suspension, which often employs enzymatic and mechanical dissociation techniques. These practices may damage cells and cause cell death that is unrelated to the experimental conditions under study. We tested methods of lung tissue dissociation and sought to minimize cell death in the epithelial, endothelial, and hematopoietic lineage cellular compartments. A protocol that involved flushing the pulmonary circulation and inflating the lung with Dispase, a bacillus-derived neutral metalloprotease, at the time of tissue harvest followed by mincing, digestion in a DNase and collagenase solution, and filtration before staining with fluorescent reagents concurrently maximized viable yields of epithelial, endothelial, and hematopoietic lineage cells compared with a standard method that did not use enzymes at the time of tissue harvest. Flow cytometry identified each population-epithelial (CD326(+)CD31(-)CD45(-)), endothelial (CD326(-)CD31(+)CD45(-)), and hematopoietic lineage (CD326(-)CD31(-)CD45(+))-and measured cellular viability by 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD) staining. The Dispase method permitted discrimination of epithelial vs. endothelial cell death in a systemic lipopolysaccharide model of increased pulmonary vascular permeability. We conclude that application of a dissociative enzyme solution directly to the cellular compartments of interest at the time of tissue harvest maximized viable cellular yields of those compartments. Investigators could employ this dissociation method to simultaneously harvest epithelial, endothelial, and hematopoietic lineage and other lineage-negative cells for flow-cytometric analysis.
流式细胞术是一种强大的工具,能够逐个细胞地同时分析多个参数。用于流式细胞术的肺组织制备需要创建单细胞悬液,这通常采用酶解和机械解离技术。这些操作可能会损伤细胞并导致与所研究的实验条件无关的细胞死亡。我们测试了肺组织解离方法,并试图将上皮、内皮和造血谱系细胞区室中的细胞死亡降至最低。一种方案是在组织收获时冲洗肺循环并用Dispase(一种芽孢杆菌衍生的中性金属蛋白酶)使肺膨胀,随后切碎,在脱氧核糖核酸酶和胶原酶溶液中消化,并在使用荧光试剂染色前过滤,与在组织收获时不使用酶的标准方法相比,该方案能同时使上皮、内皮和造血谱系细胞的存活产量最大化。流式细胞术鉴定了每个细胞群体——上皮细胞(CD326(+)CD31(-)CD45(-))、内皮细胞(CD326(-)CD31(+)CD45(-))和造血谱系细胞(CD326(-)CD31(-)CD45(+))——并通过7-氨基放线菌素D(7-AAD)染色测量细胞活力。在肺血管通透性增加的全身脂多糖模型中,Dispase方法能够区分上皮细胞与内皮细胞的死亡情况。我们得出结论,在组织收获时将解离酶溶液直接应用于感兴趣的细胞区室可使这些区室的活细胞产量最大化。研究人员可采用这种解离方法同时收获上皮、内皮和造血谱系以及其他谱系阴性细胞用于流式细胞术分析。