Agra Tuñas María Carmen, Hernández Rastrollo Ramón, Hernández González Arturo, Ramil Fraga Carmen, Cambra Lasaosa Francisco José, Quintero Otero Sebastián, Ruiz Extremera Angela, Rodríguez Núñez Antonio
Área de Pediatría, Servicio de Críticos, Intermedios y Urgencias Pediátricas, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Grupo de Investigación CLINURSID, Departamento de Enfermería, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, España.
Grupo de Trabajo de Ética, Sociedad Española de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos (SECIP), Madrid, España; Servicio de Pediatría, Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Badajoz, Badajoz, España.
An Pediatr (Barc). 2017 Mar;86(3):151-157. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2016.01.014. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
Spinal muscular atrophy type 1 (SMA-1) is a progressive and fatal disease that leads to ethical problems for Paediatric professionals. Our objective was to determine the ethical options of Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) paediatricians as regards a child with SMA-1 and respiratory failure.
A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted using an anonymous questionnaire sent to PICUs in Spain (which can be accessed through the Spanish Society of Paediatric Critical Care web page).
Of the 124 responses analysed, 70% were from women, 51% younger than 40 years, 54% from a PICU with more than 10 beds, 69% with prior experience in such cases, and 53% with religious beliefs. In the last patient cared for, most paediatricians opted for non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) and limitation of therapeutic effort (LET) in case of NIV failure. Confronted with a future hypothetical case, half of paediatricians would opt for the same plan (NIV+LET), and 74% would support the family's decision, even in case of disagreement. Age, prior experience and sex were not related to the preferred options. Paediatricians with religious beliefs were less in favour of initial LET. Less than two-thirds (63%) scored the quality of life of a child with SMA-1 and invasive mechanical ventilation as very poor.
Faced with child with SMA-1 and respiratory failure, most paediatricians are in favour of initiating NIV and LET when such support is insufficient, but they would accept the family's decision, even in case of disagreement.
1型脊髓性肌萎缩症(SMA-1)是一种进行性致命疾病,给儿科专业人员带来了伦理问题。我们的目的是确定儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的儿科医生对于一名患有SMA-1且呼吸衰竭的儿童的伦理选择。
采用向西班牙各PICU发送匿名问卷的方式进行横断面描述性研究(可通过西班牙儿科重症监护学会网页获取问卷)。
在分析的124份回复中,70%来自女性,51%年龄小于40岁,54%来自床位超过10张的PICU,69%有此类病例的既往经验,53%有宗教信仰。在最后照料的患者中,大多数儿科医生在无创机械通气(NIV)失败时选择无创机械通气和限制治疗力度(LET)。面对未来假设的病例,一半的儿科医生会选择相同的方案(NIV+LET),74%会支持家庭的决定,即使存在分歧。年龄、既往经验和性别与首选方案无关。有宗教信仰的儿科医生不太支持初始LET。不到三分之二(63%)的人将患有SMA-1且接受有创机械通气的儿童的生活质量评为非常差。
面对患有SMA-1且呼吸衰竭的儿童,大多数儿科医生倾向于在这种支持不足时启动NIV和LET,但他们会接受家庭的决定,即使存在分歧。